Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 16 April 2020 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3766B3A130E; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=EaAC9EN+; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=Y01nYBYM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDRuUjgM5_1F; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58FD43A130D; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B72F4073E; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEF4F4073E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=EaAC9EN+; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Y01nYBYM
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNGrTqk-TdPs for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C24F4073D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7014 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2020 23:17:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1b64.5e98e774.k2004; bh=eonbBuFGulaBFgIpHC67jDve5E+ZGqJ9b3kk7sk4hpM=; b=EaAC9EN+nVwRKbzyIR6/suj71bTPT+VHMsMmOIT/nwMrsAzTAgzpbAuI7fpHuQpI7LIeAZHqalcCpIxHDJKdPjvcQN6fiNowdqHISxHLfjRDcvfWaTgo0IfbVqTVxRbF/MqfSSa/h+uOxmgigTEN5lxlVTrnzRqKjCrmTzH247UF3OggVwFR3EvPpkOcxKathaONW3X4sznP6vN6NSYMahQFXK4ZhxEDdfWuDcH7b5eJUmYGJQtBqYEGv+x6OP6C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1b64.5e98e774.k2004; bh=eonbBuFGulaBFgIpHC67jDve5E+ZGqJ9b3kk7sk4hpM=; b=Y01nYBYMHONdkWJm5/GU17YxLlkZKnoZXLTbG2r5t5wW4JNkOthCdCzdJgBGjngOczZTrq/GAfsujc/tGzvLQTa+BxlU8bYoWDLT4sSpi/hsYGEyO27gldlaj/tYAbzCfkVSkpeLgqz3pyNfBHxduEVaT1p29MM5CAT97jUHRNsodKSkBpgHA1MNqvSG6EpWCuWFwE/8Kkgz/Vcws5sW+lK2CTyN80Ijo2blcwC0y24EIIk6VRgNSu+nhkqM/YW2
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 16 Apr 2020 23:17:08 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 305D417EFD3C; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 16 Apr 2020 19:17:07 -0400
Message-Id: <20200416231708.305D417EFD3C@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
In-Reply-To: <12393.1587078258@localhost>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] acknowledging reviewers name in RFCs
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-interest" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

In article <12393.1587078258@localhost> you write:
>I found this in my outbox from nearly a year ago while looking for something
>else.
>
>There was some strong support that if we were going to Acknowledge reviews
>and other activities, that we should do it in a semantically meaningful XML
>way.
>
>There was a mix of views about criteria for who should be acknowledged.
>At this point, I'd like to leave it to authors to decide, and perhaps some
>WGs might decide to experiment with guidelines.
>
>In order to get there, it seems that we need to add semantic XML, and I don't
>know what the process would be do that.

You can add it as an issue here.  No promises.

https://github.com/i-rse/rfc-issues/issues

R's,
John
-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest