Re: [Rfced-future] Filling the RSCE position (was: Re: Comments on -07)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 07 January 2022 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683133A0BE6 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:43:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=oWLLtQL9; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=XwyGZezs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11VGMpyZdNNY for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE8E3A0BE3 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D895C01A4; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 19:43:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 19:43:07 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=7 Pppf/yRv8CAUh//W3fCIwNmREjTlhuGQU2v2MafmwE=; b=oWLLtQL9bZQzqcaEW PYnyM1yU1iLkuKdLHAZSQRjkW3gtNhPolPQ+zGb7V533J9BpPokzdcmNScVg5IW9 eA2EeSHI6rc4adlhRwCnfhDik3Wsht0Vy0UI9AMBxFMzSo9drBi1qwpjcEOd2Exj bCNBhcXIaMEs//CZgBO60z/QH20DpJziciyR1yVQVQMz89lFMf6kDqoWiYWh/QnP NYCAoUelGprBS8nL+/3TiIQ6To0FDyrV+ntuQexZ6SP7v163TdKIX+PkmaOIVXQv VmpMaWLevgYNBFps8ImBtoHlfx5uM7jJAHItSBufV9nnBXTxyPfUiT5VuvK+pzaB G7vzg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7Pppf/yRv8CAUh//W3fCIwNmREjTlhuGQU2v2Mafm wE=; b=XwyGZezsVKW12O6hcOWDLcr0pkaAF7cHvqyaryk23Are/a5uNHh4U3mud wbkHBW5JSkZsaESaTYJVEKFf3mfUdqItZA+jf5Q4N2hTxgr3Wu/+mm7k6mgQpOlL tZD0HX8ycrzbGnFO9gBb5GgS8Vc2W8RnuwEn1h3uedY35WpqnS5g11tc9WzX7VtF Bf2YEfDavu44UObsyo6taU1tJ1yrHZYq2SAl7N8du0Gp1cib7C3c1Br6rM3AA4gn Ec9wVVQ9pFY2Jz7PEn/z3Xa2yse6hGP8PxSOKYm8AqQ4ahoUlIty+7Q19aazfKOs gxEbNtDOyoWl1t5ZYk+EsOUj1jl6Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:m4zXYZxlTvM3JSKvGkExUac75EF0R6aH5nYq-UnoTgBTG8_4kxdA3A> <xme:m4zXYZSHcUNVGQwSKma9C7gdqgJp4iXh5Uo1ZOT3cEVcwoxoBsjpFYKHqvpokoNV5 CLOLmxXz6EyjPjheA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:m4zXYTUK9gKGbs8uszZHeLb1mQwdCCS3sCJIxFDHzDID1-umKryfmGHIsf5LXwI53ZEZZUId2V__LH0U-zTAHsX2mibakHLwIiW7viE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudegtddgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv rhcuufgrihhnthdqtehnughrvgcuoehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeufeejudeiieeitdeivdeffeekjeevgfelgefhvddvvdff veegffegtddugeetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvght vghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:m4zXYbhirfOpRHT0j4G-pEA0sQ__yxs3_ZqkWdxQ2RrHVT0tflLh1w> <xmx:m4zXYbAcaFWEo131flSKTpn9PqXyqkKCVgOzbfxsh_BSndcmzC3hKA> <xmx:m4zXYULzQHoVGPJU5tGGnNZH0q9em5hHQmLBzxtVviGuSGCiymi-CQ> <xmx:m4zXYW7WPFZnPjWtC5oTs5VDrp93aZvNJFVnN21zS7GzAZ7hV1MwoA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 19:43:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <95292ae2-e5ad-675b-97cd-ef29028bf23c@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 17:43:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org, Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
References: <F0016CA1725A561034951054@PSB> <7D28CA5F-594B-4212-9155-86669654A504@ietf.org> <A1A5EDBA-7598-4E74-ACEE-B7A39A8010F5@kuehlewind.net> <de858e02-a6ff-613b-3d2c-db85d5ea42b1@lear.ch>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <de858e02-a6ff-613b-3d2c-db85d5ea42b1@lear.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/TGvCMm493ReD6mywW-OpnFiEAeg>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Filling the RSCE position (was: Re: Comments on -07)
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 00:43:13 -0000

On 1/3/22 7:51 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> On 03.01.22 14:43, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> This is the text in draft:
>>
>> "The IETF LLC will form a selection committee, including members from 
>> the community, that will be responsible for making a recommendation to 
>> the IETF LLC for the RSCE role.”
> 
>> [snip]
> 
>> However, I would also like to note that th text says the LCC Board 
>> forms the selection committee and not the ED. While these are 
>> internals on how the LLC Board manages itself, I would assume that’s 
>> rather a job for the LLC Board chair with approval of the whole 
>> (community-selected) board than the ED. This issue was discussed and 
>> confirmed (changing responsibility from the ED to the whole LLC board 
>> in GitHub issue #40).
> 
> Yes, that was indeed Issue 40 which you opened in April and was closed 
> after we discussed it in detail and came to a conclusion in July.  
> However, by design, the text above does *not* refer to the board, but 
> rather to the LLC.  The sentiment that carried the day at the time was 
> perhaps best summarized by Martin Thomson:
> 
>> Split the difference and say the LLC is responsible, this would likely 
>> fall to the Executive Director, but no need to explicitly specify that
> (See the notes <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-111-rfcefdp#>).
> 
> It's not that the LLC board DOES decide or that the ED decides on the 
> RSCE position, but rather it is for the the LLC board to decide whether 
> to delegate that decision.
> 
> What I am drawing from all of this, by the way, is the importance of 
> closing this document, because people really are losing context of the 
> decisions that have been made.  The chairs will have more to say on that 
> shortly.

Your document editor has gotten lost in reading this thread. Does 
someone have proposed text?

Peter