Re: [Rgchairs] thoughs about the IRTF

Pete Resnick wrote:

> On 11/2/04 at 9:15 AM +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> >I would be reluctant to confuse this publication stream with
> >individual submissions, and I think it would be useful to define a
> >clear path via the IRTF Chair (or the IRSG) from the IRTF to the RFC
> >Editor to a published document.
>
> In among all of the other discussions we've been having about the
> future of the IRTF, one of the things (at least some of us have)
> talked about was a separate "Research" track (akin to the Standards
> track) for IRTF documents so that research folks could have some
> recognition other than "just another Informational document".
> Personally, I think this would be a good thing.
>

I definitely agree (again). This ("Research" track RFC)
provides us means to inform the community of a peer review
process and offer a "status" for refereed work. Quite a few folks,
especially from academia, are hesitant to bring in contributions
exactly due to this existing deficiency!

Regards,

-Rajeev

>
> pr
> --
> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rgchairs mailing list
> Rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs

_______________________________________________
Rgchairs mailing list
Rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs