Re: [Rgchairs] thoughs about the IRTF

"John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 01 November 2004 20:31 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA27489; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:31:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COj4i-000285-F9; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:46:49 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1COicu-0000yj-EC; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:18:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1COiOD-0003eh-MQ for rgchairs@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:02:53 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA23369 for <rgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:02:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tom.iecc.com ([208.31.42.38]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COidA-0001Iu-Gj for rgchairs@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:18:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 28573 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2004 20:02:50 -0000
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 1 Nov 2004 20:02:28 -0000
Date: 1 Nov 2004 15:02:50 -0500
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.56.0411011501320.27089@tom.iecc.com>
From: "John R Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: [Rgchairs] thoughs about the IRTF
In-Reply-To: <F308DD21C5FEBD44F7D97DCC@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
References: <20041029083030.GE2249@james> <Pine.BSI.4.56.0410310022460.17494@tom.iecc.com> <F308DD21C5FEBD44F7D97DCC@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Cc: iab@iab.org, rgchairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF research group chairs list <rgchairs.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs>, <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:rgchairs@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs>, <mailto:rgchairs-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: rgchairs-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: rgchairs-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c

> What path could be clearer than "write a good internet-draft, get RG
> consensus on it, and ask the RFC Editor to publish it"?

That seems pretty clear.  Once we do that, is it an irtf draft or an
independent submission?  I've gotten conflicting messages recently.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Mayor
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.

_______________________________________________
Rgchairs mailing list
Rgchairs@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rgchairs