Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05

 We have an IPR, in the process of being filed over the next few days.

Thanks,
Alankar

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think you should talk to J IPR person and ask for an assessment, I
> wouldn’t disclose before
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
> *From: *Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 18:13
> *To: *"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Jeff Tantsura <
> jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, "
> rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
>
>
>
> ok, chairs, so what's the policy, if in doubt disclose?
>
> I don't see any danger if, as Pascal says, it has been all properly put
> out for 6550 anyway ....
>
> I read 6550 years ago and thought it a clever solution to a profitable,
> highly constrained routing problem but I never thought that RIFT somehow
> relates to it (except having had the realization reading RPL that it's ok
> to not do a generic graph for everything I remember). I'm having fun
> talking to Pascal now and discovering that we came from opposite side of
> the engineering spectrum (RPL for overly meshed topology  that it prunues
> and low speed/power and RIFT from pre-wired topology variants @ very high
> speed & scalability) and the same branches of graph theory were attracting
> both of us to solve the problems ;-)
>
>
>
> thanks
>
> --- tony
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
> pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> IANAL:
>
> Though it is really far-fetched, there may be a conceptual inheritance
> from IPR disclosed by Cisco related to RPL (RFC 6550) for the concept of
> north/south split.
>
> Even so, that IPR was declared to the IETF and RAND terms were announced
> at the time.
>
>
>
> This being said:
>
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
>
>
>
> All the best;
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Rift <rift-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *John E Drake
> *Sent:* jeudi 12 avril 2018 15:35
> *To:* Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; rift@ietf.org
> *Cc:* rift-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
>
>
>
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Rift <rift-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Jeff Tantsura
> *Sent:* Friday, March 30, 2018 3:22 PM
> *To:* rift@ietf.org
> *Cc:* rift-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
>
>
>
> Hi RIFT,
>
>
>
> Request for WG adoption of draft-przygienda-rift-05.
>
>
>
> The authors have requested the RIFT to adopt draft-przygienda-rift-05 as
> the working group documents.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by April 15, 2018.
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
> response needs to be sent to the RIFT mailing list. The document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff & Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rift mailing list
> Rift@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rift mailing list
> Rift@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>
>