Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 April 2018 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rift@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5AE1241F3; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id now81HFFqzSU; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255EA127010; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u189so12765856wmd.1; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=s9WB+GbjU4zhsrD2ZmfLEWNuznhQdsfMC4pV2pCJV7Q=; b=Pl64xu5vHHaEEkuSIwO7gR7VRw8jhAJfSyUkvoCK7aHiFddUmq4awmh7O8vUTR/slA p7PfofpLLTZ/CK3a3TxRfIajYMO7Sm5wJvXVEVJXfMemTa1LAp0drEEP/iZpxgwk4gRT fkC7SuUaZnFaYsptIwnGpojlNAagPsuAz7TKEZJJh2RS37sKqQA4pQBu2TDK7RcCeVx2 j3Jair/DFd8xNy4CbJanh3tQqguFGjlEsLv2zzTTnFjgXa6fDatNdbk8Ec06lA+H+G85 YaJ4VINs399aejRxcUBhz/cm0XoNr+csj6V5wh57Uo4Bhxj0XmV2ODTVP51esRUauvMh MCIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=s9WB+GbjU4zhsrD2ZmfLEWNuznhQdsfMC4pV2pCJV7Q=; b=g+Vh50Iy18B2Slt3j0b+6njtFSjI9Fvar4aIC96Mak2FdIff5+R1Dgf8gsrePHlC8u DrcWMtRTC0iDFHU81CWtj7b4vXqZxqdyhhSSs/gYQC/S6bSXrkgn9GuuPhxZqgR3gvy/ FGGFQvexZrwJh062ujbCwvGxZXfyJgjvs26QDZn0MTEg5Gp+ZxxTXK1tdW/7BVj3F6fT RDqCOcbCOzPxAiw2DX2Nqw/2ilywIWKJKk/gADg8UU8ZWNLQl6I/gdxpa1G5NX6uguVl bDJDUzkh2pPJaNOUTK6zH7aatQgrqJ+dfM+B7vd56EYuVJNWJxO9MBgdemQU4XUisvKc F/aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBqbFbosPfuTUHALkHevO8jn/xZ07BGSv2/q7KTe9/YlJD6gE3v lmMbYSIYAO6Rz2pG2dkno1DsgaMnvLj1anBYmKo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/BfgRtAFtLJ3FiS21QC3EgqSyqjSFYY6aPooPPtieAN+KLSafojDP49nsz7V/81Hml3lDt2BYgw+6E5Td9TUA=
X-Received: by 10.80.178.165 with SMTP id p34mr15773633edd.200.1523549629695; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.169.93 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8892bca2bacc47e6964c799be1acf8a1@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <D4839F07-99C0-4009-B444-B54334A019FB@gmail.com> <DM5PR0501MB3831A0FF24B5FE6A8741A6BAC7BC0@DM5PR0501MB3831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8892bca2bacc47e6964c799be1acf8a1@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:13:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hOA=EJWO45P-pvMXzW1MNsJiRFejGMvN+FqvVyVTYJgwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "rift@ietf.org" <rift@ietf.org>, "rift-chairs@ietf.org" <rift-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c8a3a79cc950569a90a36"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rift/QT-e_nhDX2B2RmWCCYigdypc-uA>
Subject: Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
X-BeenThere: rift@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Routing in Fat Trees <rift.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rift/>
List-Post: <mailto:rift@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift>, <mailto:rift-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:13:54 -0000

ok, chairs, so what's the policy, if in doubt disclose?

I don't see any danger if, as Pascal says, it has been all properly put out
for 6550 anyway ...

I read 6550 years ago and thought it a clever solution to a profitable,
highly constrained routing problem but I never thought that RIFT somehow
relates to it (except having had the realization reading RPL that it's ok
to not do a generic graph for everything I remember). I'm having fun
talking to Pascal now and discovering that we came from opposite side of
the engineering spectrum (RPL for overly meshed topology  that it prunues
and low speed/power and RIFT from pre-wired topology variants @ very high
speed & scalability) and the same branches of graph theory were attracting
both of us to solve the problems ;-)

thanks

--- tony

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>
> IANAL:
>
> Though it is really far-fetched, there may be a conceptual inheritance
> from IPR disclosed by Cisco related to RPL (RFC 6550) for the concept of
> north/south split.
>
> Even so, that IPR was declared to the IETF and RAND terms were announced
> at the time.
>
>
>
> This being said:
>
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
>
>
>
> All the best;
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Rift <rift-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *John E Drake
> *Sent:* jeudi 12 avril 2018 15:35
> *To:* Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; rift@ietf.org
> *Cc:* rift-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
>
>
>
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* Rift <rift-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Jeff Tantsura
> *Sent:* Friday, March 30, 2018 3:22 PM
> *To:* rift@ietf.org
> *Cc:* rift-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Rift] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-rift-05
>
>
>
> Hi RIFT,
>
>
>
> Request for WG adoption of draft-przygienda-rift-05.
>
>
>
> The authors have requested the RIFT to adopt draft-przygienda-rift-05 as
> the working group documents.
>
> Please indicate support or no-support by April 15, 2018.
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email stating of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
> response needs to be sent to the RIFT mailing list. The document will not
> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each
> author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff & Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rift mailing list
> Rift@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rift
>
>