Re: [rmcat] test cases for coupled cc [was: Re: Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-02]

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mirja,

Please see inline below.

BR

Zahed



On 02/24/2016 12:06 PM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote:
> Hi Zahed,
>
> I agree with Michael. My view is here that we need to evaluate each 
> combination of a certain scheme to couple things using a certain 
> congestion control algorithm separately. 
Fine. but again what exactly are we supposed to evaluate? the 
performance of the congestion control algorithm or the performance of 
the coupled congestion control algorithm? or something else.
> That means, if someone proposes a new (generic) scheme for coupling, 
> we as a group would only advise to use this scheme with a certain cc 
> algorithm if we have seen results for this specific combination. Does 
> this make sense to you?
Kind of, this means it is fine to have a coupled congestion control that 
may not work will all the combinations even if RMCAT proposes more that 
one congestion control algorithms.

I didnt get the "generic"  part though. How can the WG call a coupled 
congestion "generic" even if that fails to show results with all the 
RMCAT CC algorithms (assuming RMCAT has proposed more than one CC 
algorithms)?
>
>
> I hope this also reflects the view of the wg. If not, please let us 
> now and we would need to discuss this again.
>
> Mirja
>
>