IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24E721E81C4 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.627, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMcUfYYiM8FJ for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DCC21E81B1 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,676,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="73690633"
Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2013 02:25:33 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.35]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 02:25:33 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: WG WG <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
Thread-Index: AQHOgeskTVHCq6dfa0ehB1PLI+N1XA==
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:32 +0000
Message-ID: <025A278C-55F2-4EB4-A12F-677F8F01A0D0@netapp.com>
References: <201307160608.r6G680RY026646@rcdn-core-4.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <980135FF614B8945A016EA1C926546E3@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes@tools.ietf.org" <draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:37 -0000

Possibly of interest to RMCAT.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
> Subject: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
> Date: July 16, 2013 8:07:59 GMT+02:00
> To: <tsvwg@ietf.org>
> 
> (as an author)
> 
> Toerless and I put together a draft about legacy rate-adaptation based only on loss vs. what RMCAT is looking to (for RTCWEB), which is based on delay and loss.  Here's the URL.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes-00.txt
> 
> It's more raw than we had in mind, but we believe this is necessary, based on implementation experience and what users and customers have in their networks, or are planning on having in their networks soon.
> 
> James & Toerless
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email