IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ

"Michael Ramalho (mramalho)" <mramalho@cisco.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mramalho@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA9E11E80F3 for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 06:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3v4zhPBB4nB for <rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 06:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA41F11E80E9 for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 06:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373979972; x=1375189572; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+CzeyVHk7jeKH0SZiKsd86ovWHGMxIfOzc+0GS2sPk0=; b=K5py1VjK0zwqcDAiQnReOXKGOBxQO578KBGueIzUbyKs2TVlpQ/3uZCP Dd36hE2Plyn1WCn0nmNzL7pRHOUIVRIWyzgA+Gyimfb8v0acrUV/QxPUz PxYBEPk2XwZ7zGzMjJzmGs4dGQ3uGKxlWjMdxVdptoYcjeGX3Klltv13T w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFABlE5VGtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwY0T8FdgQ8WdIIjAQEBAwE6RAcEAgEIEQMBAQELFAkHMhQJCAIEEwgBiAEGDLYNjy44BoMGbQOpKYFZgTmCKA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,676,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="235434862"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2013 13:06:09 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6GD69Rv018334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rmcat@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:06:09 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.2.54]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:06:08 -0500
From: "Michael Ramalho (mramalho)" <mramalho@cisco.com>
To: "rmcat@ietf.org" <rmcat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
Thread-Index: AQHOggZ1ibmIYctWIUyl3FUXvgClMZlnRd2Q
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:06:08 +0000
Message-ID: <D21571530BF9644D9A443D6BD95B910315595CC7@xmb-rcd-x12.cisco.com>
References: <201307160608.r6G680RY026646@rcdn-core-4.cisco.com> <025A278C-55F2-4EB4-A12F-677F8F01A0D0@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <025A278C-55F2-4EB4-A12F-677F8F01A0D0@netapp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.125.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." <rmcat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat>
List-Post: <mailto:rmcat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmcat>, <mailto:rmcat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:06:16 -0000

RMCAT Design Team,

The draft Lars references below is a formal request for a DSCP dedicated to "RMCAT-only (or other nice delay-based cc) traffic".

It will take a while to become socialized ... and we can progress our RMCAT work in the interim.

Michael Ramalho

-----Original Message-----
From: rmcat-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rmcat-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eggert, Lars
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:26 AM
To: WG WG
Cc: draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [rmcat] Fwd: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ

Possibly of interest to RMCAT.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
> Subject: [tsvwg] Submitted ID on delay vs. loss-only rate-adaptive for DiffServ
> Date: July 16, 2013 8:07:59 GMT+02:00
> To: <tsvwg@ietf.org>
> 
> (as an author)
> 
> Toerless and I put together a draft about legacy rate-adaptation based only on loss vs. what RMCAT is looking to (for RTCWEB), which is based on delay and loss.  Here's the URL.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-polk-tsvwg-delay-vs-loss-ds-service-classes-00.txt
> 
> It's more raw than we had in mind, but we believe this is necessary, based on implementation experience and what users and customers have in their networks, or are planning on having in their networks soon.
> 
> James & Toerless
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email