Re: [Roll] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3 compression

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 31 December 2014 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54921A1A6E; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:58:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MN28R8vDGFWw; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4521A1A5E; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4C120012; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:03:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9B21A637FE; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:58:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D26637F4; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:58:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5C9D8B2D-8779-450A-B558-D35323BA18FE@tzi.org>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848AC2314@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <184B78CA-953E-45AB-B00C-B3A12CFE4605@tzi.org> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848AC7D04@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <54942758.6090705@innovationslab.net> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848AC86C5@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <549440F0.8040407@innovationslab.net> <5C9D8B2D-8779-450A-B558-D35323BA18FE@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:58:14 -0500
Message-ID: <12622.1420055894@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/-32YVtRxvqB5gp1gWSD_DbfV0gc
Cc: "6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3 compression
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 19:58:18 -0000

someone wrote;
    >> So, it seems prudent (to me) to look at each of the alternatives and
    >> determine which warts everyone concerned is willing to live with.
    >> Running code is a good way to do that.

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > I agree with Xavi here: This is a good way to gather data for
    > implementation issues (such as the implementation complexity of the
    > “efficient” variant of the NHC approach).  It is not so good

so, I think that we have consensus that this can not be left to the plugfest.
A number of people have not replied; some ADs and some WG chairs.
(I realize that Gabriel Montenegro is new in this position; maybe he can
bring a fresh viewpoint?)

I am going to put up a doodle poll for the week of Jan. 12.
My goal is not to need it, that we will have a plan for the Jan 9, 6tisch
call.  Please: how do we proceed?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/