IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Add ROVR in DAO?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 23 August 2019 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E591201CE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZKHZN7P0J0G for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24556120124 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (CPE788a207f397a-CMbc4dfb96bb50.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [174.116.121.43]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6421F45E for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 06BD13FB5; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <MN2PR11MB35653048AE54B21CCF055031D8A40@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB35652CCE7A961CD581EDE47DD8C60@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR11MB35653048AE54B21CCF055031D8A40@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> message dated "Fri, 23 Aug 2019 09:43:16 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:53:07 -0400
Message-ID: <15452.1566593587@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/68RJDlwNapmpiCFXxbxmQA6PX8o>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Add ROVR in DAO?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:52:41 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > As noted below, and discussed at the WG meeting at IETF 105, it would be good
    > to convey the ROVR field in the DAO, so if the Root and the 6LBR are
    > different entities then the root can build a full EDAR as opposed to the
    > dummy one.

    > It will also help make RPL more secure in the future.. So I’m calling to
    > confirm the discussion in Montreal and if there is no opposition I’ll go
    > ahead and propose a new option that can be placed with the DAO to transport a
    > ROVR.

So, this will be used by unware-leaves?
    EARO(ROVR) -> 6LR
                  6LR ---DAO(ROVR)---> 6LBR

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email