IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] AMI applicability: storing/non-storing.

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 05 November 2013 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D8521E818C for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:52:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQeXzcP1r0i9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BED21F969F for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:50:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6202027E; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:01:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F0C5A63B88; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:49:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC38963AED; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:49:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4c8f248d750f480baaf5f2a4dde71621@CO1PR04MB346.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <23764.1375904475 at sandelman.ca> <13540.1383601637@sandelman.ca> <4c8f248d750f480baaf5f2a4dde71621@CO1PR04MB346.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:49:59 -0500
Message-ID: <7933.1383677399@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] AMI applicability: storing/non-storing.
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:52:11 -0000

Popa, Daniel <Daniel.Popa@itron.com> wrote:
    Daniel> However, my point is that these challenges are mostly related to
    Daniel> RPL storing mode of operation. As a consequence, I am OK to
    Daniel> narrow down the scope of the applicability statement for AMI to
    Daniel> only RPL non-storing mode of operation, as I stated in my
    Daniel> previous email. As for having different specs for different use
    Daniel> cases, I expect that by focusing only on RPL non-storing mode a
    Daniel> single AMI applicability statement will be able to cover
    Daniel> efficiently "all" the reasonable requirements, for "all" use
    Daniel> cases.   

Ah, I did not understand that from your previous email.
Yes, please.  Pick non-storing, and lets' proceed!!!

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email