[Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9010 (6556)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 23 April 2021 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933943A0825 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7T5cj2IF3RnG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8513A0835 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A3CD8F407DC; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: pthubert@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, dominique.barthel@orange.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, roll@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210423133028.A3CD8F407DC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/DfCfn1-Sy7SzR-X5bI0yumKDsPc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:34:23 -0700
Subject: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9010 (6556)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:30:58 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9010, "Routing for RPL (Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) Leaves". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6556 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org> Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- [RFC6775] also introduces the Address Registration Option (ARO), which is carried in the unicast Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages between the 6LoWPAN Node (6LN) and the 6LoWPAN router (6LR). It also defines the Duplicate Address Request (DAR) and Duplicate Address Confirmation (DAC) messages between the 6LR and the 6LBR). In an LLN, the 6LBR is the central repository of all the Registered Addresses in its domain and the source of truth for uniqueness and ownership. Corrected Text -------------- [RFC6775] also introduces the Address Registration Option (ARO), which is carried in the unicast Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages between the 6LoWPAN Node (6LN) and the 6LoWPAN router (6LR). It also defines the Duplicate Address Request (DAR) and Duplicate Address Confirmation (DAC) messages between the 6LR and the 6LBR. In an LLN, the 6LBR is the central repository of all the Registered Addresses in its domain and the source of truth for uniqueness and ownership. Notes ----- Extra closing parenthesis Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9010 (draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-30) -------------------------------------- Title : Routing for RPL (Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) Leaves Publication Date : April 2021 Author(s) : P. Thubert, Ed., M. Richardson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9010 (6556) RFC Errata System