[Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9010 (6556)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 23 April 2021 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933943A0825 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7T5cj2IF3RnG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8513A0835 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A3CD8F407DC; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: pthubert@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, dominique.barthel@orange.com, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: nmalykh@ieee.org, roll@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210423133028.A3CD8F407DC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/DfCfn1-Sy7SzR-X5bI0yumKDsPc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:34:23 -0700
Subject: [Roll] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9010 (6556)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:30:58 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9010,
"Routing for RPL (Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) Leaves".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6556

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>

Section: 4.1

Original Text
-------------
   [RFC6775] also introduces the Address Registration Option (ARO),
   which is carried in the unicast Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and
   Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages between the 6LoWPAN Node (6LN)
   and the 6LoWPAN router (6LR).  It also defines the Duplicate Address
   Request (DAR) and Duplicate Address Confirmation (DAC) messages
   between the 6LR and the 6LBR).  In an LLN, the 6LBR is the central
   repository of all the Registered Addresses in its domain and the
   source of truth for uniqueness and ownership.

Corrected Text
--------------
   [RFC6775] also introduces the Address Registration Option (ARO),
   which is carried in the unicast Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and
   Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages between the 6LoWPAN Node (6LN)
   and the 6LoWPAN router (6LR).  It also defines the Duplicate Address
   Request (DAR) and Duplicate Address Confirmation (DAC) messages
   between the 6LR and the 6LBR.  In an LLN, the 6LBR is the central
   repository of all the Registered Addresses in its domain and the
   source of truth for uniqueness and ownership.

Notes
-----
Extra closing parenthesis

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC9010 (draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-30)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Routing for RPL (Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) Leaves
Publication Date    : April 2021
Author(s)           : P. Thubert, Ed., M. Richardson
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG