Re: [Roll] Wg adoption call for draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration

[Robert Cragie <[e-mail]>]

Agreed but silence is tacit disapproval as a positive indication of 
approval is being asked for.

On that note, I support adoption of 
draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration by the ROLL WG.

Robert

On 11/02/2014 2:04 PM, Ines Robles wrote:
> Hi Abdussalam,
>
> I apologize if I didnt use the correct words, and thanks for your comment.
>
> I would want to say with it, is that it is important the opinion of 
> each member of the WG for that and the silence is not good.
>
> But if you don't answer, yes, it has no value, like you say.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Ines.
>
>
> 2014-02-11 10:54 GMT-03:00 Abdussalam Baryun 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>:
>
>     On 2/11/14, Ines  Robles <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>     >Silence is a vote against
>     > adoption.
>
>     Why is that? usually in engineering *silence* should always have no
>     value. Against SHOULD be with engineering reason, and agreeing MAY be
>     with engineering reason.
>
>     AB
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Roll mailing list
>     [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll