IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Wg adoption call for draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0721A0310 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4ZSqfq2_yB8 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645241A030B for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z6so6729459yhz.13 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BJ2zqxdE6Uk5XoOd/q2FYJHWgLnNegvh70Ve/BEphss=; b=r5z8iO9crG9g6wOhcK0rU24idGGQoEGYcc/LkMWNBWzsXY2tNFF3v4QnJqnJgOMmji LNBF+Q7MAeZWZyCe6m4DLDNND/4BiseSL3hxd7Gue3e4CGXz6fQzWHBhcA3F/eIsWUYS y81YIB+bEiPuZqIZjhdoKSeh+q95UNvKzJ/76o8rqC/txbHhrCCVL3WiJLQdrhU+/wz9 romktVty6A1k38tgBzTbAbHfgo6Gtm20AXOwc6hkOCwLN4NEH4+/DtIW9JrnVb6hSEWT KJWYWnwdJxcnSB7eswlXM8P+YTZa4gKKnZ3IkzCvCeXBEB5SLA/mlXzxwGqAERg/qxik NApA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.123.193 with SMTP id v41mr2104483yhh.68.1392126866788; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.222.3 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 05:54:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUc9hF3Bf8KP1NpQbSkR2Xd5fDAABhEG4yfT7s9vGdq9fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUc9hF3Bf8KP1NpQbSkR2Xd5fDAABhEG4yfT7s9vGdq9fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:54:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-uBbc+WL2bnaqvzBa05sRSLK7=9Rh9PbLfkJ8dLj3cxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [Roll] Wg adoption call for draft-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:54:29 -0000

On 2/11/14, Ines  Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Silence is a vote against
> adoption.

Why is that? usually in engineering *silence* should always have no
value. Against SHOULD be with engineering reason, and agreeing MAY be
with engineering reason.

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email