Re: [Roll] DAO lifetime

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Randy:

Sorry for overlooking this. Answer is that it depends on the path sequence (see section 7.1 in RFC 6550).
A same sequence indicates multiple parents that can be used in parallel. New sequence cleans all state from the preceding sequence.

Clarification: the non-storing DAO does not indicate a path but a one parent-child relationship.

Cheers,

Pascal

From: Roll [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Turner, Randy
Sent: vendredi 25 septembre 2015 16:54
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Roll] DAO lifetime

Hi Guys,

I was hoping someone could answer a quick question regarding non-storing mode and DAOs - If I establish a route to a node using DAO with transit info at time 0 with a lifetime of 100 lifetime units, and then 20 lifetime units later, I send another DAO for the same target address specifying a different path, will this latest DAO cause the root or LBR to overwrite its' routing information for the destination?  I was trying to figure out if I need to explicitly send a DAO with a lifetime of 0 (or something else) to kill the previous route before sending a new DAO for the same destination?

Thanks for any replies...
Randy


P PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.