Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments

Federico Consoli <admin@ipv6it.org> Sat, 05 May 2012 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <admin@ipv6it.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC36721F85D9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aISiXNI+EZHZ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F61F21F85C0 for <Roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 May 2012 10:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhr7 with SMTP id hr7so1892729wib.13 for <Roll@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 May 2012 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=jKY72TVOkWljQhc6dyncb7nbTwZBUQdsFyJFIzpb0gU=; b=e3C2izczQOYq7c0cNYsR1f4WVvZisTyDKbsksgo+ZuafaWWXagMYREFchwHeWv0Diq u634o+LKey9ltxPQIlOJYEougpF8Z+tl1GNOn9k3kHgqSwpbH9NlJQbu/B/z8tQUNH+6 RmpaL3AamA+D1/bZyY/BB9fHkDNpgdDTyDR6+OeJGBm4bAjnTSMj1amyQOWzyrq+i7iw Phky0uGpeHnQJzEaXvSK+CmFi7vkWe4lc6zubE/VCjM9bUYA3bicijVjhVtIxvyljc6V IfjDsxmSm1qNM7S+mH8mv2WFaDEDUUxqUEf0jtn+RU7A6eeHgVmX07aQ5+x6T7gvRQDs qkRA==
Received: by 10.180.24.130 with SMTP id u2mr3858300wif.12.1336238854900; Sat, 05 May 2012 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host77-121-dynamic.8-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [87.8.121.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j3sm11344826wiw.1.2012.05.05.10.27.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 May 2012 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FA562FF.5090909@ipv6it.org>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 19:27:27 +0200
From: Federico Consoli <admin@ipv6it.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
References: <1039288746.280931.1336238283627.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1039288746.280931.1336238283627.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktlZpePuRyjMLF4rKd983tNn7jglDbx3HsbfbNa1U0e4zBkBxuFycGycmwaZFtGeOtCoCx
Cc: Roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-10 comments
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 17:27:37 -0000

Il 05/05/2012 19.18, Mukul Goyal ha scritto:
>> [Mukul2]
>> You described two separate scenarios:
>> 1) A has 15 neighbors, B has just A as the neighbor.
>> 2) Both A and B have 15 neighbors including each other.
>>
>> In the second scenario, K=1 definitely makes sense because there are many candidate paths and one such path to B would probably be discovered even though many of B's neighbors would end up suppressing their DIOs. It is possible that the discovered route wont pass through A.
> [Federico3]
> I think this is the problem, the fact that the node B does not have full
> information about the status of his neighborhood. In the second scenario
> node B will use a path almost certainly worse to reach a neighbor of the
> node A.
>
> [Mukul3]
> IMHO, there is no problem. There is no need for B to know the route through each neighbor. All it needs to know is one path that meets the constraints specified by the origin. The need to avoid too many DIO transmissions is critical and K in default configuration option is set to reflect this priority.
[Federico4]
Yes but the information about the route through each neighbor is very 
important for the objective function.

> Thanks
> Mukul
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll


-- 
Regards
Consoli Federico