IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?

"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Tue, 21 May 2013 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BDC21F9636 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kaHqbdA1mVHi for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5DC21F96B7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 17:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41065 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1UeaBQ-00068z-Vz; Tue, 21 May 2013 02:12:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: johui@cisco.com, mariainesrobles@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:12:04 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/128
Message-ID: <067.081907fd6195c3034e6e8c71a7eb4a93@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 128
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: johui@cisco.com, mariainesrobles@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 00:12:13 -0000

#128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?

 From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn at ieee.org>

 Apart from the fact that this draft is introduced in ROLL to address a
 problem
 inherent in multi-link subnets, I see nothing in the proposal that
 limits it to such
 networks.  It seems to me that trickle multicast could be considered in
 other
 applications, e.g. homenet, if it compares favorably with PIM-xM in
 complexity.

 Thread http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg07845.html

-- 
---------------------------------------+-----------------------------
 Reporter:  mariainesrobles@gmail.com  |      Owner:  johui@cisco.com
     Type:  enhancement                |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                      |  Milestone:
Component:  trickle-mcast              |    Version:
 Severity:  In WG Last Call            |   Keywords:
---------------------------------------+-----------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/128>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email