IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 26 August 2013 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB87011E819F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 06:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.278, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkI0MXM6Oa8V for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 06:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9870011E819C for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 06:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [209.87.252.140]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4DAA22087; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:46:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (quigon.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D044CA0D6; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618CE748B@011-DB3MPN2-083.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
References: <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618CE7376@011-DB3MPN2-083.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <CE3A1504.22FF6%d.sturek@att.net> <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618CE748B@011-DB3MPN2-083.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Dijk, Esko" <esko.dijk@philips.com> message dated "Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:12:09 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:22:17 -0400
Message-ID: <6504.1377480137@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #128: Trickle multicast could be considered in other applications?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:46:54 -0000

Dijk, Esko <esko.dijk@philips.com> wrote:
    > The situation I have in mind is a LLN mesh network where 'hosts' (IP
    > hosts) can reside at any position in the network. For example, a mesh
    > network where 50% of nodes are MPL Forwarders (together constituting a
    > single MPL domain) and 50% of nodes are hosts that don't know anything
    > about MPL. Suppose one of these hosts, host A, sends out an IP

I really wonder about these MPL-ignorant nodes which are part of an LLN mesh
(and therefore, I think), speak RPL.

Can you tell me more about them so that I am less skeptical about them being
mythical.

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email