IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F7E3A1A22 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:03:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Z9ilHegX; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=QmnMro6Z
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJLGZ725tfte for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E273A1A1F for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:03:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2378; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1607976227; x=1609185827; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=V6/6v2LFdPBp3NS1t7apL6TxLhITHJ58cb62qH+JMZI=; b=Z9ilHegXw41g5gU6TWs8WJbtT6rIqj7QwjaHhHaIX8UrXzN7//7AlrBm kUMhT577vd3C8NBn1Up28gPun5plWbUneUcv+eUhadVeI2XN0zG76eGrj MCRnAxJFqpNF+pK+3dkRIlQOg+bWuHfOuKjn8SUH9HVVnB5KKLLB7P5XZ w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:kMYGGxHOzuvUr3XM2DJKFp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401QWbXIjH5bRDkeWF+6zjWGlV55GHvThCdZFXTBYKhI0QmBBoG8+KD0D3bZuIJyw3FchPThlpqne8N0UGGcviaRvVuHLhpTIXEw/0YAxyIOm9E4XOjsOxgua1/ZCbYwhBiDenJ71oKxDjpgTKvc5Qioxneas=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpCQAtxNdf/5JdJa1iHgEBCxIMQIMhUQd1Wy8uhD+DSAONVQOZCoFCgREDVAsBAQENAQEYCwoCBAEBhEoCF4FqAiU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFYQyFcgEBAQECAQEBEBERDAEBLAwECwIBBgIYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEEyKDBAGCVQMOIAEOkB+QawKBPIhpdoEygwQBAQWCTIJFGIIQAwaBDiqCdYN5hlkbgUE/gTgcglU+gl0BAYElOheDADOCLIFpXmAEU1p8OQyPX4NOk1WRNgqCdJtIAx+iPLUpAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFtI4FXcBU7KgGCPlAXAg2OIYNxhRSFRHQ3AgYBCQEBAwl8iXABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,420,1599523200"; d="scan'208";a="830790283"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 Dec 2020 20:03:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0BEK3lnA031455 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:03:47 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:03:46 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:03:46 -0600
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:03:46 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=iK2cT/da0qKJOeTdpP0m/QJ9xtkhEvKCmRdw6ubqrgY5G7pk5COhGokWDId3P9NBAaIP4aJ4rbaZJ/Msdo/qDsGO9bb4lHBAnlVuMEyMMJGJwAjHr8gLgR2IV7dUF+VEUW6ClFiymlle86mhVp9fsqWV8XZZxLzG5qyhyTo9TNDpW3tKtqfolADZuSYEW/ht5U0EGA97QIrqMTK5xR3FXCRW6oqAqSlbBW6KzWfWNqArpPj4Qfj/rA0DFmv1LOj/xSRba1PSx/606CKW68uQPVkDn/F8yCumdLrIvBskrlpwatFwQLz24Obu/eA7YQu37lBUZVKLio7PgiefYr8w8Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V6/6v2LFdPBp3NS1t7apL6TxLhITHJ58cb62qH+JMZI=; b=dxc9ikxqx/feWXrUnDjkYzEJRgA+vTWbXDkYP7sgOxyJJXB6UR0i3heNeHvR8Wkq4rH6EhjZPkFsQA+lPOU6TZEC9ZhdrLd6LbFbkv0jFZas6pgJeEY9+QxgGI4qakhSMdwqht0HLuZbkA/Fu8goX3GMGN+GEHuHlE8/EewYvhlJiznwY2SwP08F8sG27wMPIi8yI5gAKVYlDaLAK9hbh/b8WaFiK92ExRACbzer2RZ66AXnEGpYA/niNpBRkX68NF/vvuj4eOOE2iGQhuvAPKopcMgIAlW4swJlKHKsit6uokT7sEahSp6ZRrwf2pVAXNyKZiOtJh2foA+PPptLwg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=V6/6v2LFdPBp3NS1t7apL6TxLhITHJ58cb62qH+JMZI=; b=QmnMro6Zsi7aY6BrNkLSvsp67WJ1UPZ811A7+96rYcTdo+6J8H8MDnhJdaSxdeM4zbNEgWOYzW+JwCacPwhNDVHHLrlcTlTpme3ihkVD/mECQMQkOWostDj75zrmkXn2a8gcJ1aCc2OUSXUdmmqDOW51H5d+Bpje0oSxheCN+uA=
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:91::20) by MWHPR1101MB2127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:58::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.14; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:03:44 +0000
Received: from CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61]) by CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:4510:59d6:8f61%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3654.020; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:03:44 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
Thread-Index: AQHW0lH9XpEXX1/BtkewvObEpkbF26n3A8+V
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:03:44 +0000
Message-ID: <0CF0DCA8-FCAE-435B-9C23-CC00DE80F42E@cisco.com>
References: <CO1PR11MB48818A537C3EA3FC85E73C0BD8C70@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <161a2e64-0325-5a22-ce1d-28a58888aaed@saloits.com>
In-Reply-To: <161a2e64-0325-5a22-ce1d-28a58888aaed@saloits.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:6102:8476:d167:68ca]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c103c6e8-7d0f-48b8-5722-08d8a06b5ca1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR1101MB2127:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR1101MB212746CAD07FB91CF747E648D8C70@MWHPR1101MB2127.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:949;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: XVHubm+f+x3HzQ2fofzCiPokTxWLEOA8lVVn7i5Cwmaddis/4kb/ttlbN/rnM0F9kjvlmgrQBvTX/Rrmfqt4feCwtQ1QzQbpvJEVqtuiDH2eF2Cvcf63LQd9w/YQ5ei+zHJL5KY3XFUEncj29S6a8gaA0TFR/rXminp1WVCbn2l+Isq4RQU5Y6xuI8OIxOL3ti7SKvmmHgnM6/oky8lfRAcv+9ud66k0Je6PT/Wo8C5mKswOxZ0974Sb89taQtFJsygbZUs+nrA1ZOag7r5J3s3WakN8gUARssbqEH3SdPk0kMXeklQ2leOArX9ouoDOkEZHcwxUlk4oGWq+1rL2qRodoGK9y7dA2pco0VL0JtzJczEiQjcNgCSC+vc5L9IVh0C7pm1LBvrYMRmMWcOKQ6rKI9N49u/1lrLTo+nwTEHbyLEVI9PaLAe+K3mXu41SdBayQy23mtP77mSChxicbQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(76116006)(71200400001)(6512007)(66946007)(6916009)(5660300002)(91956017)(86362001)(966005)(66446008)(8936002)(83380400001)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(508600001)(33656002)(8676002)(2906002)(2616005)(6506007)(6486002)(36756003)(186003)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c103c6e8-7d0f-48b8-5722-08d8a06b5ca1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Dec 2020 20:03:44.7573 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: U1qSMIl5epHuL5ZdJhtdAwsokKH0XRy1xAW9p0YDyj4CXwHjmpIsq31pqF99vTqnKP6gAujUiALXa7g/b+HE4g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR1101MB2127
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/QzCRqsRwgyXAFbe97eqr-iiXx8c>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-Unaware-Leaf or RPL-Unaware Leaf ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:03:51 -0000

Many thanks Timothy!

Ines, do we agree to change both drafts to say RPL-(un)aware Leaf|node ?

Pascal

> Le 14 déc. 2020 à 20:47, Timothy J. Salo <salo@saloits.com> a écrit :
> 
> On 12/14/2020 9:08 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
>> Dear all:
>> We just got this remark in Elwyn’s review of the RUL draft:
>>> s1, s2.2, s2.3: The term defined in [USEofRPLinfo] is RPL-Unaware-Leaf rather
>>> than RPL-Unaware Leaf: s/RPL-Unaware Leaf/RPL-Unaware Leaf/ (3 places).
>>> Similarly s/RPL-Aware Leaf/RPL-Aware-Leaf/ (1 place) and s/RPL-Aware
>>> Node/RPL-Aware-node/ (2 places).
>> I wondered, in terms of English which makes more sense?
>> We can fix either draft. I can’t understand why useofrplinfo has a ‘–‘ between aware and leaf?
> 
> The rules for hyphens in English include:
> 
> o Use a hyphen to join two or more words serving as a single adjective
>  before a noun.
> 
> So, "RPL-Unaware Leaf" would be better than "RPL-Unaware-Leaf".
> Hyphenating "RPL Unaware Leaf Node" might be, in my opinion, a bit more
> ambiguous: Do you mean "RPL-Unaware-Leaf Node" or
> "RPL-Unaware Leaf-Node".
> 
> Another of the hyphenation rules is:
> 
> o Use a hyphen to avoid confusion.
> 
> This might rule might provide some insight into "RPL-Unaware-Leaf Node"
> or "RPL-Unaware Leaf-Node".  In this document, I think that
> "RPL-Unaware Leaf Node" would be preferred, because that we all
> understand that "Leaf Node" is a essentially single term.
> 
> In general, I don't think there should be a hyphen between aware and
> leaf.
> 
> -tjs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email