IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Multi-Link Subnets via /128

Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> Thu, 25 July 2013 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310AF21F8FA1 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qcy07cHJ55k9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm18-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D921F8EFE for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.39.60.169] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jul 2013 22:53:23 -0000
Received: from [98.138.84.173] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jul 2013 22:53:23 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp107.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jul 2013 22:53:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1374792803; bh=jkgJavOHlV3uJU8fneO9nBP84Ev7WAjOP5/0fwGIKCA=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; b=IE6qVPMpKXw1fBKgq/2fqSRI/TbRtMRnAEmMIgg6kPvjzLrAeiaJhr+6dsJCnCbABFrsaZUyfrbniPnV7exA9kX7tW+PgjkDRewSvbtJE2mCBD/V9B0TiN6mgZ/+dB6JRi903kyAZMK9ZjbIDM9nMLMGbG5scxo2w04ZxcxkT2s=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 538432.66611.bm@smtp107.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: jeajAgoVM1kf2wcZZ00ge8sQQYOvM7uT1UAHmOoOzD1oplE VIlQ208VY.uT59C1wfZa.hGAdrgCzK.zyb7Zq41AphKzjA.nX9T8t9tkhub1 4Uck40Hi0aCR02Q_DFf9.8YFXrAcgtFIbqLF6fggQzTaiJupv_pPBnCuwIqB B9b0kEvqNiYWrvY6VQvgkUpIclY40rcywQWHKe1YAfT.GTVgC2F96LZhRhgI AgB3kJcSYW_Pkl3hEhrOdNfgYIaUwMR4vdCkZ33Ib6RPUnT.3g.erd3b8dto 8S66MogIYXdAlAtY3RxdT13LNB5hlJs6vE4OMErITdl8aw3nidBiOelICSPp nTsFugy.oKQk4oKX0bXD6vsjAhos0SnRFAHo1rPJVtsVABstxmxbaXvFztgw kXMccppxMi4AxJflNVAQpdpCVog1qn4prNSHAWBTERrNiLwXEQ76i.vZbIFq xvIHHhDzeFfc6QKtnNrLVU5_D0R39_LOatneI8e7gslQazK1CQFEgVPnBLac zR7T2z9r_C2T5l.i4_MI-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fvjol_aswBAraSJvMLe2r1XTzhBhbFxY8q8c3jo-
X-Rocket-Received: from [10.0.0.4] (d.sturek@67.124.200.231 with login) by smtp107.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2013 15:53:23 -0700 PDT
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:50:53 -0700
From: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Message-ID: <CE16F9B7.22665%d.sturek@att.net>
Thread-Topic: Multi-Link Subnets via /128
In-Reply-To: <14375.1374790058@sandelman.ca>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Multi-Link Subnets via /128
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:53:31 -0000

Hi Michael,

I mispoke on the last point.  Should have read:    multi-link subnets
versus allocating a /128

Don


On 7/25/13 3:07 PM, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

>
>
>Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
>    > We did a good bit of work on the mDNS topic and there are quite a
>few
>    > subtleties in the mDNS draft that are really focused only on
>correct link
>    > local operation.   Here are a few (from RFC 6762):
>
>Ah, I understand now, and I agree.
>I thought you were saying that mDNS replies could not have ULAs in their
>answer sections.
>
>I agree that all of the things you mention have to be adjusted in order to
>permit mDNS to work over MPL.
>
>My question remains:
>
>    > I would like to know what a multi-link subnet via /128 means.
>
>
>--
>Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email