IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] New Version Notification for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A63621F94AD for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s66azDDBLjiz for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1637621F9445 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:10:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1143; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1361808635; x=1363018235; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=F8bey/j2qQXB6ZIC8yNeHcUW6a6+ClyKWLrdOwNT7FM=; b=I/xgl+HTkBvlOGyRD9VmGXltug0XVN6AX4du+v8vmv6oJnxEIMrxO7zX 3CPLsDTYg2wp87FE52L9wcRqwlcEFZHyV+fuWE8QP/hU11X8KtiO90zUt Fcii8KilFk4z5UQ1TSdnItAwox8Kfngf4OwepHEWnf3truqDG35+VTAYj 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFADiMK1GtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABFwVWBBRZzgh8BAQEDAXcCBQcEAgEIDgMEAQELHQcyFAkIAQEEDgUIiAUGvxmOXSYLBwaCWWEDiDOeb4FSgTWCJw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,735,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="180870373"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2013 16:10:31 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1PGAV1E031355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:10:31 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.89]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:10:31 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] New Version Notification for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac4TRt1lRn7yWP4fSC6poc/BQIBG4gAVTjiAAAqSwNA=
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:10:31 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:10:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD835CCEA4F@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD835CCE70A@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <5674DD97-6DE8-425F-B40B-5AB52941E094@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5674DD97-6DE8-425F-B40B-5AB52941E094@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.88.253]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] New Version Notification for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:10:36 -0000

Hi Carsten:

That's a bit of an oversight. Yes, we actually discussed the idea at 6LoWPAN. There was even a vote at 2 or 3 meetings. 
The first time, a majority wanted to continue the work. Then the vote was retried got few hands in equal numbers either way. 
What I got from individual people is that they wanted that job done but thought that 6LoWPAN as it stood was not the right place. 
And then I was asked to publish it at ROLL, because the issue that is addressed comes with fragmentation in route over mode.
That's where we are...

Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo@tzi.org] 
Sent: lundi 25 février 2013 16:07
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] New Version Notification for draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt

Hi Pascal,

On Feb 25, 2013, at 11:58, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> a large packet must be reassembled at each hop

I thought we had debunked that idea in 2008.  (For people who weren't there then: Read more about it in the 6lowpan book.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email