[Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Tue, 21 August 2018 09:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A60130E77 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 02:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o0EO7wvhy_tr for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBC7130DC3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 72-v6so3315586itw.3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Li23UyUbLSKcAdlystj23UJrsy791OqRYk5AvG72TYc=; b=F/xf4cf5s5PN4dQp5J6zhQKo1hPxen4XwscznEufJcbP9cAr2e+Qp8ucLgv5kmbSg/ BxzSnTvZCpwwdudY3ji0W6+CrroGAiRSCiWwp5OPraDBt/MVCxfffh978+4p6ByDnMOl knDkXSxJmKItORBQwIxSddTt3oSpFxcI6p+QwN3RChLZ8NzX/mrb8kE3XrRifz7LhDnm ptxEaxvcw2lHhO9/9Vjxtr6LJ0+8NHkLGXSbIjOD78BPbROlZhv/htQgVs090fPH55RU +nQJ9kwqstrv//heEGRrtBfYFlVrhSE1/m10AAXakthE6OZ1V4dFbNUNovAIfFVaN0Xf /ulA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Li23UyUbLSKcAdlystj23UJrsy791OqRYk5AvG72TYc=; b=UBGbiQnr4kXD0uXT2mPIhOFBPFZzBecoAjekwt2VT0nCUfLtjJAMThO0WLo+iG5Ae9 haKB/h9kI3ZQXuZbjJBqsKATLPdxePjO520EWrr/Nm3YDf79yRw9lruoWgJ4tHXP05/v sicO5f9FbDcfnvJKGXT76vmLRLXZmX3S5C6NzW1doFCcqR+XFEVKqsDcjH2H2t3o1srs hdl/hC93olEb2GFP/M+6Fn5BSZAw8DbZ7uVi5iv1ryYrdEnwzxnWMXH5Rq8JEA2fyBjI WGRF7jLCjbcGs7wV0CcZdHsyZ2DfVpp/E0Di7V13z0TB5gi45dMA8BABo/KQ4L8cfgLL ELUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFVw2tR8eAJ7lk+o5zAY83ql+aC/7yxU10NaLfj8w57rqW02h0C cdLRWouWoCWdGp5wk6RBw3jd2KrKXUgOxBnwvu+sKjQ1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPweJY6NW6SYD07/pPxL7ycCTN4gnnmHCo6qBJVpVv8g0vnVNXrOfaVyejw70JB9nX6K8w/fBjQJXUlFMmuHMmU=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:9588:: with SMTP id m130-v6mr16017526itd.48.1534844881717; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 02:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:47:50 +0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUdnS2Stv+-YsqvOrdc=s1jc_0E+UWKU=ErD1w+n9QaQOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5cd7a0573eeeb8b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/ccCNrslLuo-fyqDtCRIYNVTLj4U>
Subject: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:48:06 -0000
Dear all, Thank you very much for your reviews on the required drafts. So far we have: - For WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-03: to add corrections by this thread: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10568.html - For for draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-04: to add corrections by this thread: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg10570.html - WG Call for adoption: RPL-Observations. => Adopt this document. Could the authors please submit a new ietf draft with some text in the introduction explaining that this is a WG informational document, that is not intended for RFC track but as WG discussion track. Parts of the document may be used in other future RFCs. We have created new tickets to address the concerns discussed in IETF 101 [ https://trac.ietf.org/trac/roll/report/2] #179 Security considerations for dao projection #180 13 issues to address in dao projection draft (lifetime, MOP, retransmissions, route cleanup) #186 Useofrplinfo - AD review #187 New version of RFC6550 - Topics to include #188 Should 6LBR be included into the DODAG root? #189 RPL and new MOP? Are #189 and #187 strongly related in anybody's view? Thanks, Ines and Peter
- [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets Rahul Jadhav
- Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] ROLL WGLCs and new tickets Rahul Jadhav