IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Thu, 05 April 2012 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=435672ecd=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B021F8587 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 06:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.722, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSjd5zWkooGd for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip2mta.uwm.edu (smtp.uwm.edu [129.89.7.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9965021F8577 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAKWjfU9/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABFhW+2DQEBAQQBAQEgSwsMDxEEAQEDAg0WAwIpHwkIBhOIDguoF4lriQmBL44TgRgEiFmNEoERjyODBYE2Fw
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256EC1FD0B7; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:56:16 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BJSZAgPXmO6u; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FDE1FD0BC; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0500
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
Message-ID: <1865443707.1824785.1333634175774.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <97B69B30E0EF244B940B65EA541E3F2D0221638D@AMXPRD0510MB390.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [129.89.7.91]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.13_GA_2918 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.13_GA_2918)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:56:17 -0000

Ticket resolved.

Resolution text: P2P-RPL, being an extension of core RPL, cannot be separated from trickle algorithm.

Thanks
Mukul 

----- Original Message -----
From: "C Chauvenet" <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
To: roll@ietf.org, mukul@UWM.EDU, jpv@cisco.com
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 8:33:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm

See inline.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de roll issue tracker
Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2012 13:00
À : mukul@UWM.EDU; jpv@cisco.com
Cc : roll@ietf.org
Objet : [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm

#92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm

 Discussion:

 [Cedric]
 Another point that has been discussed today during the ROLL meeting, is  that some people may find other mechanisms than trickle more efficient to  flood the RDO.
 Could we let the door opened to other flooding optimization mechanism, or  explicitly say that the trickle mechanism MUST be used ?

 [Mukul]
 I think inherent dependence on the trickle mechanism is apparent because  of the fact that the route discovery takes place by forming a temporary  DAG. DAG creation (or DIO generation) depends on trickle algorithm. So,  P2P-RPL also depends on trickle algorithm. P2P-RPL being an extension of  core RPL, I dont think there is a way to separate P2P-RPL from trickle  algorithm.

[Cedric2]
Fine. If this is needed for RPL compliancy, then I agree.

-- 
-----------------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  jpv@…                  |      Owner:  mukul@…
     Type:  defect                 |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major                  |  Milestone:
Component:  p2p-rpl                |    Version:
 Severity:  Submitted WG Document  |   Keywords:
-----------------------------------+---------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/92>
roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email