Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm
"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 13 April 2012 13:32 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9380A21F872B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVrirbzV2SBG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057A921F85F0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SIgbo-0002HQ-0n; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:32:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: mukul@UWM.EDU, jpv@cisco.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:32:14 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/92#comment:1
Message-ID: <070.ffd44fa4b29b2617d67f7d2b7420e4a4@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <055.4f67aded0ee3d83f8b18258686aba080@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 92
In-Reply-To: <055.4f67aded0ee3d83f8b18258686aba080@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mukul@UWM.EDU, jpv@cisco.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:32:21 -0000
#92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL independent of trickle algorithm Changes (by jpv@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Resolution: ---------------- No. P2P-RPL depends on DAG creation for route discovery which inturn inherently depends on trickle algorithm. Discussion: ----------------- [Cedric] Another point that has been discussed today during the ROLL meeting, is that some people may find other mechanisms than trickle more efficient to flood the RDO. Could we let the door opened to other flooding optimization mechanism, or explicitly say that the trickle mechanism MUST be used ? [Mukul] I think inherent dependence on the trickle mechanism is apparent because of the fact that the route discovery takes place by forming a temporary DAG. DAG creation (or DIO generation) depends on trickle algorithm. So, P2P-RPL also depends on trickle algorithm. P2P-RPL being an extension of core RPL, I dont think there is a way to separate P2P-RPL from trickle algorithm. [Cedric2] Fine. If this is needed for RPL compliancy, then I agree. -- -----------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: jpv@… | Owner: mukul@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: p2p-rpl | Version: Severity: Submitted WG Document | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -----------------------------------+---------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/92#comment:1> roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
- [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P-RPL… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P… C Chauvenet
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P… Mukul Goyal
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P… Mukul Goyal
- [Roll] Closure text for ticket #92 Mukul Goyal
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #92: Is it possible to make P2P… roll issue tracker