Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-03
"Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com> Mon, 28 January 2013 15:52 UTC
Return-Path: <johui@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA86721F87C4 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:52:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxXUIT8LBnQ3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1101B21F87D3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:52:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3910; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359388321; x=1360597921; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=R0Hzvi8kRXf76jDOQd12FhkMv1Gip3oZ0vkenylHwFo=; b=JxCtHNh2MkJ62Di9Nd3Q6FyUg7brN4UDiwvkldYB4yI5Z3SZ20hbd7qj gV0I1DhWY/GS/xLUIOAO6PaHrLiGB4pg079It6rQZgv88G6Szqy7c8PuR YMvnEsSXR1rdp8ksQqaFmTItL91z9drBO8XG/1VMZ4PHPd6fWCBrZ+f/J Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABGeBlGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABEvlkWc4IeAQEBAwFwCQULAgEIGAokIRElAgQOBQgBh3YDCQYMtgQNiVWMEIEKAQmDIGEDiCyMC4JyihqFEoJ3gW81
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,551,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="169235396"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2013 15:52:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0SFq0B6010104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:52:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.79]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:52:00 -0600
From: "Jonathan Hui (johui)" <johui@cisco.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-03
Thread-Index: AQHN/W9oT2fXxKK2sEKFqr+pjlBCPw==
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:51:59 +0000
Message-ID: <B50D0F163D52B74DA572DD345D5044AF186E4114@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <CADnDZ88Vq5h+dzJNQfCStc4w9G+Bqqk7A+uQo0bDPD=fhvE=TA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_JLNMgPmd1ztChd63Fwjiw++JZ4fdPBv_wJNWcFBubmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_JLNMgPmd1ztChd63Fwjiw++JZ4fdPBv_wJNWcFBubmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [128.107.155.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <A54DBB0BAD57EF48B541ABAD6C640540@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "richard.kelsey@silabs.com Kelsey" <richard.kelsey@silabs.com>, roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:52:01 -0000
Trickle does not utilize any knowledge of neighboring nodes. -- Jonathan Hui On Jan 26, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: > The draft does not clarify how the MPL forwarding knows its neighbors, > or the MPL neighbor is not defined in the doc, please advise, > > AB > > On 1/25/13, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear I-D Authors, >> >> I done a little review so far and need answers to continue, as the >> ROLL chair asked for some discussion on our WG draft, which I will try >> to do so far. >> >> I see that the draft's applicability statement does not include >> *shared medium*, but the *trickel algorithm* works for shared medium, >> which in RFC6206 states that in the abstract. So if this MPL uses >> trickel do you think it still will work in a non-shared communication >> medium LLN, Please advise? >> >> otherwise I recommend to add the words as in trickel: *lossy shared medium* >> As in the appplicability statement section 3 >> >> AB> Recommend Amend to> >> This protocol is an IPv6 multicast forwarding protocol for nodes in >> shared medium within the low-power and lossy network domain. By >> implementing a controlled dissemination using the Trickle algorithm, >> this protocol is designed for networks that >> communicate using low-power and lossy links with widely varying >> topologies in both the space and time dimensions. >> >> AB> question on section 3> I am not sure I understand *the space and >> time dimensions*, Do you mean that the topology or multicast-nodes >> is/are changing in space, please give me an example use-case? >> >> Regards >> >> AB >> >>>> On 1/22/13, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/report/8 >>>> contains the list of open tickets. There are some threads >>>> linked in each ticket. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/103 >>>> trickle-mcast: suppress ICMP messages for PROACTIVE_TIMER_EXPIRATIONS >>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg07424.html >>>> >>>> This ticket has had no significant discussion. Is there an issue >>>> here? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/104 >>>> security considerations. >>>> We need to have a discussion about what are the implications >>>> of this protocol. See next message. >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/105 >>>> trickle-mcast: how to determine scope of MPL domain >>>> We have several options from Robert Craigie in the ticket system. >>>> Alternatives 3 and 4 were discussed, and I think that we preferred >>>> option 4 with the multicast option always present. >>>> Please post if you disagree. >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/106 >>>> trickle-mcast: always use 6in6 encapsulation for non-link-local >>>> multicast >>>> no clear resolution, but ticket #105 suggests answer. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/108 >>>> trickle-mcast: should there be an explicit version field? >>>> suggested answer was YES. >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/107 >>>> trickle-mcast: should multiple parameter sets be supported >>>> my conclusion: There is has been little discussion about this >>>> issue. My inclination is to not include multiple sets at this >>>> time. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/109 >>>> trickle-mcast: should all MPL packets be destined to all-MPL-forwarders >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works >>>> IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>
- [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-roll-tr… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] Discussion/Comments For draft-ietf-rol… Abdussalam Baryun