IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] impacts of rfc2460bis on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 21 July 2016 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A2612D8AE; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7K31YqjT83jS; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9006C12D106; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E5C200A3; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF8638D1; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6180.1469035031@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <24554.1468868593@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <799ab640-bed0-22a6-a9df-97f78c3f0bf8@gmail.com> <30725.1468924267@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <c342e18c-d2d8-8b97-12ba-f67c25413d4f@gmail.com> <6180.1469035031@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:21:14 -0400
Message-ID: <2070.1469060474@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/sXfYh72ABybgRp5TK3L87v_hb-w>
Cc: 6man@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] impacts of rfc2460bis on draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:21:18 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > today, at ROLL, we went through some slides to explain the improvements that
    > 2460bis "Note" does for us.   Here are the link to the slides:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-roll-2.pdf
starting at slide 9.
I will probably fix some minor typos and fill some missing labels
to make it stand-alone

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email