RE: Progressing: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 4:02 PM
> To: routing-discussion@ietf.org; Bill Fenner; zinin@psg.com
> Cc: Loa Andersson; Avri Doria
> Subject: Re: Progressing: 
> draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
> 
> Attention ADs.
> 
> I wouldn't claim overwhelming support, but I would also note 
> that the only issues raised so far were by you at the meeting 
> in Vancouver.

Hi Alex, Bill, 

I did not attend this meeting in Vancouver and am wondering if you can
share your objection points to this? You may point me back to minutes,
which I havn't seen/ may have missed. But IMO a cut and paste here would
help the discussion. 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar 

> 
> So where do we go from here?
> 
> We originally positioned this as Informational, but making 
> firm requirements.
> 
> My suggestion, in response to your concerns in Vancouver was 
> to keep this as Informational, but drop the requirements 
> making the Manageability Concerns section advisory.
> 
> The small email exchange on the list, however, is requesting 
> BCP status with firm requirements.
> 
> Do you want to give some guidance and enter into a discussion?
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>
> To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; 
> <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
> Cc: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se>; "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Progressing:
> draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
> 
> 
> > I agree and am in favour.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
> > To: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>; "Adrian Farrel"
> > <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
> > Cc: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se>; "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:41 PM
> > Subject: RE: Progressing:
> draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
> >
> >
> > I agree w/ Jerry's comment and in-favor of this draft.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards... Zafar
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org
> > > [mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > > Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:21 PM
> > > To: Adrian Farrel; routing-discussion@ietf.org
> > > Cc: Loa Andersson; Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Avri Doria
> > > Subject: RE: Progressing:
> > > draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
> > >
> > > > Should we advance this work as a suggestion or BCP, or
> > > should we throw
> > > > it out?
> > >
> > > IMO we should advance to BCP, and require a manageability section.
> > > Requiring the section will force the authors to give
> > > thoughtful consideration to what the manageability
> > > requirements are for the feature.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > routing-discussion mailing list
> > > routing-discussion@ietf.org
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > routing-discussion mailing list
> > routing-discussion@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> routing-discussion mailing list
> routing-discussion@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
> 

_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion