Re: Progressing: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt

I agree and am in favour.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>; "Adrian Farrel"
<adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <routing-discussion@ietf.org>
Cc: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se>; "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: Progressing: draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt

I agree w/ Jerry's comment and in-favor of this draft.

Thanks

Regards... Zafar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org
> [mailto:routing-discussion-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:21 PM
> To: Adrian Farrel; routing-discussion@ietf.org
> Cc: Loa Andersson; Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; Avri Doria
> Subject: RE: Progressing:
> draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-01.txt
>
> > Should we advance this work as a suggestion or BCP, or
> should we throw
> > it out?
>
> IMO we should advance to BCP, and require a manageability section.
> Requiring the section will force the authors to give
> thoughtful consideration to what the manageability
> requirements are for the feature.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
> _______________________________________________
> routing-discussion mailing list
> routing-discussion@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
>

_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion

_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion