IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh

David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net> Fri, 12 September 2003 20:24 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13896 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuSY-00064j-9v; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:24:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuS6-000647-4I for routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:23:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13857 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuS4-0004uu-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:23:32 -0400
Received: from m106.maoz.com ([205.167.76.9]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuS3-0004uW-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:23:31 -0400
Received: from m106.maoz.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by m106.maoz.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8CKN1F5026877; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:23:01 -0700
Received: (from dmm@localhost) by m106.maoz.com (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h8CKN10W026876; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:23:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: m106.maoz.com: dmm set sender to dmm@1-4-5.net using -f
From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Cc: routing-discussion@ietf.org, Vijay Gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>, heas@shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh
Message-ID: <20030912202301.GA26863@1-4-5.net>
References: <71159680127.20030912131208@psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <71159680127.20030912131208@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-public-key: http://www.maoz.com/~dmm/public-key.asc
X-philosophy: "I just had to let it go" -- John Lennon
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/routing-discussion/>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:23:01 -0700

	Alex,

>>  1. BTSH reference in Abstract.
>>  
>>     The abstract refers to BTSH. You may want to consider
>>     making it BTSH-agnostic, since the reader will not have
>>     any document to refer to when the BTSH draft expires.

	will do.

>> 
>>  2. Section 3.1.1 "Intra-domain Protocol Handling"
>> 
>>     The section reads as BGP-specific. I.e., it should be
>>     possible to use the TTL method to protect, say, OSPF
>>     single-hop adjacencies.

	will fix.

>>  3. Prior art
>> 
>>     You may want to point out that the TTL method has been
>>     used in other protocols, and point to IPv6 ND [RFC2461],
>>     for example.

	Will do.

	Remember also that I want to change the name. Do I need
	to issue an -01 or can I do this after the rfc-ed is done
	with it? 

	Thanks,

	Dave

_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email