AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh

Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> Fri, 12 September 2003 20:13 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13629 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:13:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuHs-0005as-Tb; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:13:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuHR-0005aM-Kq for routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13601 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuHP-0004pn-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:31 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuHP-0004pk-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:12:31 -0400
Received: from [147.28.0.62] (helo=127.0.0.1) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xuHO-000Brk-Vg; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:12:31 +0000
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Personal
Reply-To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <71159680127.20030912131208@psg.com>
To: routing-discussion@ietf.org
CC: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, Vijay Gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>, heas@shrubbery.net
Subject: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/routing-discussion/>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:12:08 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave, Vijay, John-

 In general, I believe the draft represents a useful idea.
 I do not have any major comments on it, some minor ones
 below:

 1. BTSH reference in Abstract.
 
    The abstract refers to BTSH. You may want to consider
    making it BTSH-agnostic, since the reader will not have
    any document to refer to when the BTSH draft expires.

 2. Section 3.1.1 "Intra-domain Protocol Handling"

    The section reads as BGP-specific. I.e., it should be
    possible to use the TTL method to protect, say, OSPF
    single-hop adjacencies.

 3. Prior art

    You may want to point out that the TTL method has been
    used in other protocols, and point to IPv6 ND [RFC2461],
    for example.

 Thank you
 
--
Alex


_______________________________________________
routing-discussion mailing list
routing-discussion@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion