Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh
Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com> Fri, 12 September 2003 20:26 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13974 for <routing-discussion-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:26:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuUT-0006EY-KX; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:26:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19xuUD-0006EG-KU for routing-discussion@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:25:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA13965 for <routing-discussion@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuUB-0004wQ-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:25:43 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19xuUB-0004wN-00 for routing-discussion@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 16:25:43 -0400
Received: from [147.28.0.62] (helo=127.0.0.1) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xuUB-000Dz1-E9; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:25:43 +0000
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Personal
Reply-To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <146160472337.20030912132520@psg.com>
To: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
CC: routing-discussion@ietf.org, Vijay Gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>, heas@shrubbery.net
Subject: Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh
In-Reply-To: <20030912202301.GA26863@1-4-5.net>
References: <71159680127.20030912131208@psg.com> <20030912202301.GA26863@1-4-5.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: routing-discussion-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list <routing-discussion.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:routing-discussion@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion>, <mailto:routing-discussion-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/routing-discussion/>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:25:20 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dave, I think having a -01 rev would be better. -- Alex http://www.psg.com/~zinin/ Friday, September 12, 2003, 1:23:01 PM, David Meyer wrote: > Alex, >>> 1. BTSH reference in Abstract. >>> >>> The abstract refers to BTSH. You may want to consider >>> making it BTSH-agnostic, since the reader will not have >>> any document to refer to when the BTSH draft expires. > will do. >>> >>> 2. Section 3.1.1 "Intra-domain Protocol Handling" >>> >>> The section reads as BGP-specific. I.e., it should be >>> possible to use the TTL method to protect, say, OSPF >>> single-hop adjacencies. > will fix. >>> 3. Prior art >>> >>> You may want to point out that the TTL method has been >>> used in other protocols, and point to IPv6 ND [RFC2461], >>> for example. > Will do. > Remember also that I want to change the name. Do I need > to issue an -01 or can I do this after the rfc-ed is done > with it? > Thanks, > Dave _______________________________________________ routing-discussion mailing list routing-discussion@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/routing-discussion
- AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh Alex Zinin
- Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh David Meyer
- Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh Alex Zinin
- Re: AD-review: draft-gill-gtsh David Meyer