IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems

Danny McPherson <danny@arbor.net> Fri, 12 February 2010 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@arbor.net>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB283A7733 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8pbHveyEQ7kL for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01.mbox.net [165.212.64.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AC83A7374 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:41:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01-lo [127.0.0.1]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83762CD49F; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:43:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from s1hub3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [165.212.120.254] by gateout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.61A) with ESMTPS id XID496oBLqrJ6928Xo1; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:43:09 -0000
X-USANET-Source: 165.212.120.254 IN danny@arbor.net s1hub3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET
X-USANET-MsgId: XID496oBLqrJ6928Xo1
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (97.118.239.19) by exchange.postoffice.net (10.120.220.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:41:39 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Danny McPherson <danny@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <75cb24521002120839i3c12afd6w1d04e9369ae000c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:41:59 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <EFC1EFA4-DA09-4FFD-8140-63A8F5C74577@arbor.net>
References: <32101_1265251077_ZZg0Q4CoNw0Le.00_4B6A32F8.4080800@firstpr.com.au> <48225D32-CD3B-4AE0-BFC6-5535B12BF519@wisc.edu> <75cb24521002041918l4820395dh9524b280a2b00d32@mail.gmail.com> <672B9734-BF8B-4B18-933C-4DEEC49ACA32@castlepoint.net> <75cb24521002051030v29b9183cq823c0d59b70fffe8@mail.gmail.com> <0503A92D-D633-4C19-8FA6-3CFD9FD5CD77@arbor.net> <75cb24521002120839i3c12afd6w1d04e9369ae000c3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:41:52 -0000

On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> I really think that the conversation about ipv4/ipv6 and route-scaling
> has to understand that for the foreseeable future we're going to have
> to deal with both ip protocols... and in 25-30 (maybe more) years a
> third protocol.

Indeed, hence my "long term transitional coexistence" phrasing :-)

-danny

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email