IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Sun, 14 February 2010 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F6628C10A for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:22:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.127, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-GDSu+4sYBy for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f186.google.com (mail-iw0-f186.google.com [209.85.223.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5D728C10E for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so4977471iwn.10 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:24:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/L6G7f6SMnq73m4dMTaxjQVsohmq3tM0CCWdCglozeg=; b=i9DgEvyXsjwTjhzAugy31+mABTJaakgpVGFKPKkzR1bX/6pZ+YdwI6gUNzrOGcMPgB T2d0ICNNB1MycipP6OPuYy1KwTupv9syTq5XMRKg1dOP8oKma7aE1Ep0ZG0WGuXaFe+W dtnLDdPqy9G6QNaE58vBxixUvjTKVqfSJNW+g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lbklc8LYiUELebD98DZ9O+l15qrWAw1ODwZFz6syqA8CvqSdugcgHTOI4gEEYEQfoD umxvEbR2sk0Njn362P2vEG04dACMmz62+pv1z+Fy8KEn2252/rhnOhq7cUxD9IL+ny4E gXJi2VKriClxOULp99bxCSZ4UQoFOqwqwqIm0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.172.129 with SMTP id l1mr6062566ibz.7.1266179044323; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:24:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1fd7b.112816d7.38a9b2e9@aol.com>
References: <1fd7b.112816d7.38a9b2e9@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:24:04 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 75ff40babddf64ac
Message-ID: <75cb24521002141224q6fc3c482t4066f0065f5df62f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] IPv4 & IPv6 routing scaling problems
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:22:43 -0000

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:11 PM,  <HeinerHummel@aol.com> wrote:
> In einer eMail vom 14.02.2010 17:00:37 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt

> Consider that there are more than 10,000 egress DFZ-routers ! 184 756 times
> 10 000 = 1 847 560 000 shortest routes. However there are multitudes
> thereof, if you envisioned (loopfree of course) detours as well! And if you
> envisioned that DFZ routers have more than 4 neighbor nodes (BTW, can anyone
> provide useful valid figures so that we can discuss density issues and
> aspects?)

a T1600 has 8 slots of 4 PIC's each, you can get 1x10G for each PIC.
a CRS1 (full-height) chassis has 16 slots, 4x10G on each I believe?

you can get this sort of info, as an approximation of connectedness of
a node from every vendor's website.

-Chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email