Re: [rsab] RSAB document approval process

Agreed, and thanks for the thorough plan, Mirja, it looks good to me!

Alexis

> On Mar 14, 2024, at 4:59 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
> 
> This is a very narrow interest area.  Let's let people send.  If it becomes a problem we can revisit it.
> 
> Eliot
> 
> On 14.03.2024 12:41, "Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)" wrote:
>> Hi Sandy, hi all,
>> 
>> I was assuming people could send as that’s what we also do for other leadership groups. People should not be able to subscribe; it’s sufficient that we have a public archive.
>> 
>> Alternatively we could also establish a separate list (and the  even forward to RSAB) or use the ietf last call list…?
>> 
>> Just checking what people think!
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 13.03.2024 um 22:19 schrieb Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>:
>>> 
>>> Hi Mirja, All,
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 13, 2024, at 4:58 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The reply-to will be set to rsab@rfc-editori.org
>>> Currently, the list is set up so that only members and Cindy can send mail.  Iirc, this was to avoid introducing a new discussion list.  It sounds like the RSAB list should be open to receive mail from non-members - please confirm this is correct.  Do you also want to allow people to subscribe to the list?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sandy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> RSAB mailing list
>>> RSAB@rfc-editor.org
>>> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rsab
>>> 
> <OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc>-- 
> RSAB mailing list
> RSAB@rfc-editor.org <mailto:RSAB@rfc-editor.org>
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rsab