IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rsab] RSAB document approval process

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Fri, 15 March 2024 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@staff.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: rsab@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rsab@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3279FC14F61A for <rsab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cStYzZyqtnQw for <rsab@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47A1C14E513 for <RSAB@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e6cadfffdbso1355902b3a.3 for <RSAB@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=staff-ietf-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1710470716; x=1711075516; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=aGiyRbixegtan3BRZMIIGRMvatSYGY01o1RfC5hsDmc=; b=dj27QV6bOdtEsH3WyScEeanmgu7FgASmgQ0ubiFlo0/nD5+UfZ1PJijJ4/AEiMEJPY hcEnsUZbS1QOrttmZlQWhhcRM0WprDMaRKHrv5pqk1DcvG5KCX4cFClqkhkKAwwMLT1E ygAAYKrgWCDzNnowGpRnyAlPV1+WESjyiWwviatG8JmT0R/8A+XKDiI0lfad64cB1U5R pKZ/QeKDA1QCw2eB9nCuK8hG2t2jbCGUZ/gevTDFiVECt7TvOHs99Jfj4NQZo3bBWou6 qMFNbUu2wlU1a6SfewcWv1AMj96nSJCli+/F8ify7ZBxRFJxqXVT204BXhkyG2fUPBnv g4RQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710470716; x=1711075516; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aGiyRbixegtan3BRZMIIGRMvatSYGY01o1RfC5hsDmc=; b=poRp4nZQEiJgsetYoNuMJ6Dx0l3qtDrR8TUy6+YFjmRzG06j0li1uMdVCaHr6CVDmb RAxM6pDuHIqJZuVMLUUCuMJ3pZuHCasyPXeICExlW4OY7rjhobsJWc8HS5cHhg/PZLfx fyZZZIjexsuXQUkX50ltfbbAvyfL1M5NTLtdQbNDdrhliMsU9YO2GCv7ww7Tfd1XCb+O qtTn3lpsCdTHpE2DpVsvjdUwDKT9W6B1FSL7gvF1sBh8WhgLCPtcP9QY2dwLy2zKkKXZ Wg9+QFGcRZBdQqgnYI5XETptVEdWoQzhcriJzY6dJQ6NNeXQE5MK+CZU/OMpC4Brvd69 xrIQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWUTed+gFMs1XZq1bbxxHuAUZSLzYRMLTwIlPQi+wMRkzs1wohkFiLF1OiCATGV2heITzFOZUCMN+U+z1E/KG7tNcJq
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyxp07T0bZCxLGbH1PY7U816eiLfYC5EXdBWjXUchXSJbcY//33 6mN0ePsAa52U+6cJzwqchtSRwnedhYRd/V17J4/DGjQbgZctMiLTcxbWeNJTcKs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGa94NzcBlCTAOGM0/ijuxvM25R2xZpYHzzUU3MZQHygpboGAHTbH4X0wamgEPkj3uBMQfU8A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1745:b0:6e6:bc50:bb90 with SMTP id j5-20020a056a00174500b006e6bc50bb90mr2061818pfc.34.1710470716075; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (219-89-84-78.adsl.xtra.co.nz. [219.89.84.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hq7-20020a056a00680700b006e64ddfa71asm2342184pfb.170.2024.03.14.19.45.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <72CA8E3D-C860-4D06-8B9C-0E4C3500EFFE@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:44:42 +1300
Cc: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, RSAB@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19D56768-3072-4A0A-B8BD-1ACEDBC98003@ietf.org>
References: <DFCDBA81-B3F4-4027-AEB2-0425EBBF51C6@amsl.com> <72CA8E3D-C860-4D06-8B9C-0E4C3500EFFE@kuehlewind.net>
To: "\"Mirja Kühlewind (IETF)\"" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rsab/XH1am1zRGbwtEgU_Kr6bZE6IYQ0>
Subject: Re: [rsab] RSAB document approval process
X-BeenThere: rsab@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RFC Series Approval Board \(RSAB\)" <rsab.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rsab>, <mailto:rsab-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rsab/>
List-Post: <mailto:rsab@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsab-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rsab>, <mailto:rsab-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 02:45:21 -0000

Hi Mirja

Thanks for the very comprehensive plan, it looks good to me.

On the issue of lists:

> On 15 Mar 2024, at 00:41, Mirja Kühlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> I was assuming people could send as that’s what we also do for other leadership groups. People should not be able to subscribe; it’s sufficient that we have a public archive.

Other leadership lists are private (closed readership) whereas the RSAB list is public (open readership) and so if we allow open posting that turns it into an open public mailing list, even if we don’t allow subscriptions (people can just use IMAP to get all the list messages).  That would not be helpful at all.

> Alternatively we could also establish a separate list (and the  even forward to RSAB) or use the ietf last call list…?

The other alternatives are to use the RSWG list or the RFC Interest list.  

My preference is last-call because a) that’s intended for this type of discussion; b) that's where the documents related to the change of the RFC Editor model were discussed (as well as other places); and c) it will be discussed there anyway,

	https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/rPhyJkxm7Oo4cJ_3X7AAMHZtgf0/

Jay

> 
> Just checking what people think!
> 
> Mirja
> 
> 
>> Am 13.03.2024 um 22:19 schrieb Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>:
>> 
>> Hi Mirja, All,
>> 
>>> On Mar 13, 2024, at 4:58 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The reply-to will be set to rsab@rfc-editori.org
>> 
>> Currently, the list is set up so that only members and Cindy can send mail.  Iirc, this was to avoid introducing a new discussion list.  It sounds like the RSAB list should be open to receive mail from non-members - please confirm this is correct.  Do you also want to allow people to subscribe to the list?  
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sandy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> RSAB mailing list
>> RSAB@rfc-editor.org
>> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rsab
>> 
> 
> -- 
> RSAB mailing list
> RSAB@rfc-editor.org
> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rsab

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email