Re: [Rswg] [Ext] Making progress on evolving the XML format

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Tue, 07 March 2023 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rswg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAF3C14CE2B for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 00:21:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=episteme.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VVgT1A7GzdP for <rswg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 00:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D46C14F75F for <rswg@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 00:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.1.32] (unknown [172.16.1.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92B4FE0662; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:21:38 -0600 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=episteme.net; s=mail; t=1678177305; bh=mL7J0Z2u9kX+smU1AZmGJ906HCODtJE/Rs7ff8tF8kM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=RrQrUZdXGTUgHDMi+M4Zl0IBboTj+ISMzYK6XKEFHIK6jNFmhTA9hhlf3Pfs488UC aKzo6dHL5CH3KaYljJCzVHSAQnjKOW14TEM+2mNR/ghQKDsvkZpLQNiTuoK9ey6ZEK CZX9DE7BDrNLtpIpqh6bH7reoh163IcSX3vxmDkA=
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: RSWG <rswg@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:21:36 -0600
Message-ID: <14C0E271-CD52-4721-BBB5-3F0D93E58323@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <B42D714A-8FCE-4092-AFC3-758658C9C70F@icann.org>
References: <CABcZeBM1TKqRkXJ8JErVijoKhEKOa+ebWDpxfERuq1NhUrSG4g@mail.gmail.com> <848FE9F0-5A0F-4FAA-9B7A-4E402871916E@episteme.net> <B42D714A-8FCE-4092-AFC3-758658C9C70F@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Synology-Spam-Flag: no
X-Synology-Spam-Status: score=-0.101, required 6, ARC_NA 0, __NOT_SPOOFED 0, FROM_HAS_DN 0, TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL 0, MIME_GOOD -0.1, __THREADED 0, TO_DN_ALL 0, RCPT_COUNT_TWO 0, RCVD_COUNT_ZERO 0, FROM_EQ_ENVFROM 0, MIME_TRACE 0, __BODY_URI_ONLY 0, MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM 0, __HDRS_LCASE_KNOWN 0, NO_RECEIVED -0.001
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/eAyOlaO2Xmk_ngvbXcMuQB-IDuA>
Subject: Re: [Rswg] [Ext] Making progress on evolving the XML format
X-BeenThere: rswg@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RFC Series Working Group \(RSWG\)" <rswg.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rswg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rswg@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rswg>, <mailto:rswg-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 08:21:50 -0000

On 6 Mar 2023, at 20:04, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On Mar 3, 2023, at 11:09 PM, Pete Resnick 
> <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> John, Paul, please submit a revision of
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irse-draft-irse-xml2rfcv3-implemented/
>>
>> as a WG document with the appropriate changes to indicate deviations 
>> from the RFC grammar at your convenience.
>
> We have done so:
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rswg-xml2rfcv3-implemented/

Thanks!

> On the mechanical side, this is not really a WG document because the 
> Datatracker doesn't know about the Editorial stream, so we might need 
> to do a new naming with draft-editorial-rswg-... at some point. Also, 
> xml2rfc does not accept a stream of "editorial" yet, so we said "IETF" 
> even though that is very definitely a lie.

The chairs will contact the tools folks and figure those bits out. 
Thanks for the reminder.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best