[rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition?
Otto J Wittner <otto.wittner@uninett.no> Thu, 29 March 2012 09:57 UTC
Return-Path: <otto.wittner@uninett.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9210121F8663 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ix01T-EGD00Z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from epost.uninett.no (epost.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:0:526:158:38:180:100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39E621F865D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from khuzdul.uninett.no (khuzdul.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:0:21e:4fff:feed:f70]) by epost.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 689403363DF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F7431FA.5050202@uninett.no>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:57:14 +0200
From: Otto J Wittner <otto.wittner@uninett.no>
Organization: UNINETT AS
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:57:20 -0000
This might be a totally ridiculous suggestion, but I give it a shot anyway. Is there any way that two codecs could be specified as mandatory: - one unconditionally mandatory because it is guaranteed royalty free (e.g. h261) - one conditionally mandatory, that is mandatory as long as it stays royalty free (e.g. VP8). I'm unsure if "conditionally manadatory" really makes sense, I admit. -- Otto J Wittner Tel 73557945 UNINETT AS Mob 99550566
- [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition? Otto J Wittner
- Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition? Avasarala, Ranjit
- Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory codec on condition? Otto J Wittner