Re: [rtcweb] Agenda for RTCWeb Interim May 19-20, 2014

[Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>]

ok, glad to see it is sorted out and sorry if we caused confusion. I think Teds mail was saying “how” not “if” we would do remote was depended on number of people. We always done our best to make remote work. 



On May 9, 2014, at 12:40 PM, Mary Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Well, the answer to my question initially was that the remote participation was going to depend upon who would be attending, so it wasn't clear to me there was any original intent to support remote participation.  I've chatted with Ted and I'm satisfied that you guys will do the best you can based upon the location where you are meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mary. 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On May 9, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Mary Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > It certainly would have been nice to know when the meeting was being organized that there were no plans for remote participation nor recording.
> 
> Mary that is really warping what I said out of context.  We will do the best that we can - and like most IETF interim meetings, including the CLUE ones, that will almost certainly be less than ideal.
> 
>