Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 29 October 2014 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195701A6F5B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TaX3OsALpB6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C7B1A1B73 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l18so2643550wgh.10 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=iI8cp2E6t1q2AWoNdiMUNPb0jvl2+kOlD6PQoDdfJgo=; b=e7qghg/egrCtgTszKjETh4JLTof/vUU+8a3iKDasP1hPSv4u0Q51sSxIXBii5oUPGg Zc5Pen8OHKe/QODSJbaqNxTJEwdtTHWevx42bEgKahXn5wwXMbQys/5sgm5c2BLbMXuz izVpttzoDlKuRQdx8J4Jt77RDjd/pIox0HtK3NJn+OFD9XecxVTZ4GclA9JoRdorFbHR wOMjtkRXz4DIhAB6N3j/CvhPqzPpEFcGMp/r+IPIYWQnA2i7c4mf6EHdOSxZU5rhU0QX WCDvJvTxetMdzFHWfSGQ+56gEdVKLx9V6/nyPAQmp7fgo2wb6mflfPKWTNU55JEZtF2k ojnw==
X-Received: by 10.180.211.2 with SMTP id my2mr10724935wic.13.1414568888524; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-179-96-40.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.96.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw6sm4268222wjb.18.2014.10.29.00.48.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Iñaki Baz Castillo' <ibc@aliax.net>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CALiegfmH8rRyEDbJjQ=kzMv0nGC=S9gNsE7roE=kqJyVcfgy8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmH8rRyEDbJjQ=kzMv0nGC=S9gNsE7roE=kqJyVcfgy8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:48:00 +0200
Message-ID: <095701cff34c$ad1089c0$07319d40$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIdm2glshlU301gGbh4Wgrmbmu/a5urYfsA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/FHIzv2sbjhJTKznWaFQRvJjBACk
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:48:12 -0000

Hi,
We discussed this mapping issue in a previous version of the application token draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-even-mmusic-application-token-02 example in section 1.
We thought of having a mapping from appId to "pt" (section 3.3.1)
Roni

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of I?aki Baz Castillo
> Sent: 21 October, 2014 7:26 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> May I know which SSRC (345259865 or 2693756249) will be used for the real
> media stream (plus RED and FEC) and which SSRC will be used for RTX?
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------
> m=video 62164 RTP/SAVPF 100 116 117 96
> a=mid:video
> a=rtpmap:100 VP8/90000
> a=rtpmap:116 red/90000
> a=rtpmap:117 ulpfec/90000
> a=rtpmap:96 rtx/90000
> a=fmtp:96 apt=100
> a=ssrc-group:FID 345259865 2693756249
> a=ssrc:345259865 cname:erS7E/KHLYKTejNs
> a=ssrc:345259865 msid:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
> c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
> a=ssrc:345259865 mslabel:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
> a=ssrc:345259865 label:c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
> a=ssrc:2693756249 cname:erS7E/KHLYKTejNs
> a=ssrc:2693756249 msid:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
> c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
> a=ssrc:2693756249 mslabel:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
> a=ssrc:2693756249 label:c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
> -------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> RFC 5576 does not clarify it at all:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5576#section-4.2
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 4.2.  The "ssrc-group" Media Attribute
> 
>    a=ssrc-group:<semantics> <ssrc-id> ...
> 
>    [..]
> 
>    The <semantics> parameter is taken from the specification of the
>    "group" attribute [RFC3388].  The initial semantic values defined for
>    the "ssrc-group" attribute are FID (Flow Identification) [RFC3388]
>    and FEC (Forward Error Correction) [RFC4756].  In each case, the
>    relationship among the grouped sources is the same as the
>    relationship among corresponding sources in media streams grouped
>    using the SDP "group" attribute.
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> The referenced RFC 3388 neither clarifies it:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 7.4 FID Semantics
> 
>    Several "m" lines grouped together using FID semantics form a media
>    flow.  A media agent handling a media flow that comprises several "m"
>    lines MUST send a copy of the media to every "m" line part of the
>    flow as long as the codecs and the direction attribute present in a
>    particular "m" line allow it.
> 
>    It is assumed that the application uses only one codec at a time to
>    encode the media produced.  This codec MAY change dynamically during
>    the session, but at any particular moment only one codec is in use.
> 
>    The application encodes the media using the current codec and checks
>    one by one all the "m" lines that are part of the flow.  If a
>    particular "m" line contains the codec being used and the direction
>    attribute is "sendonly" or "sendrecv", a copy of the encoded media is
>    sent to the address/port specified in that particular media stream.
>    If either the "m" line does not contain the codec being used or the
>    direction attribute is neither "sendonly" nor "sendrecv", nothing is
>    sent over this media stream.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So, how is the usage of ssrc-group? Where is it really defined?
> 
> Can I put more than 2 ssrc together in the same ssrc-group line?
> 
> How should the receiver interpret it?
> 
> Does a ssrc-group always mean RTX usage? Where is that specified in the
> above SDP?
> 
> Does not the above SDP look a complete mixture of hacks and workarounds?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb