Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9281AD41E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qIP8_hRhQDG8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFF51AD428 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.119] (fs5.wan.abq.citylinkwireless.net [216.243.124.18]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79E7AF23D8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <544938BF.2010807@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:19:59 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CALiegfmH8rRyEDbJjQ=kzMv0nGC=S9gNsE7roE=kqJyVcfgy8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHekuQCLeCYzsnm8AuTUgiVppQHUqR7MKdQ9Q=eFFAy0w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm_B5KfD5SBPzsH4YYuzD2OXdu47TtatPVmd6ihrMCh1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUF-AXcDuQmYhH91vbgPAxLkYkB==GY9opoRk7zrEP8A7A@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmxnzZ6_3rKX0paNhHas6Emvu1Mekgb9caj9NLVSf_u+g@mail.gmail.com> <5F93BF20-03B2-4D2D-BEFC-ED91250993BD@gmail.com> <54480864.4050106@gmail.com> <5448583B.5090109@mozilla.com> <54491CCB.5090007@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54491CCB.5090007@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/VcoTQIUL_z0NdSkdFmutj5XJ-Ao
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:20:17 -0000

Sergio Garcia Murillo wrote:
>> substantial (and there are a number of other problems that RED solves
>> there, as discussed at the last meeting).
>>
> Could you elaborate please?

See slide 4 of 
<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-rtcweb-7.pdf>. I 
was particularly thinking of the issues with bundle, which do not apply 
to RFC 2198 RED (which I pointed out at the mic).