Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Tue, 21 October 2014 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7111A7011 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZThZ4HRIyPRY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F4D71A6F64 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hz20so1548171lab.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=LSUWbb5Ol3C8o+hbXSXWojl/noXHHaVZOSltifqM0WI=; b=fbwWe6xJsS9yDBT3ApHX6syTqw46B1FD+oO6ZnDRIvtbHMTCdKBrgrMtZ41eEvktrk zAxWwHI9kJA/yZHNwQ4JlEiYrWEbuELln8OivZof9DqOrR3lZIg3lNWECYHLYOuTwvnn bYYMZbTylhQVxcOMIJpcR4kC7cCQw5Ryg2DFNfowJKT+pfNm3LMR8RXD5hOeFrF33WJu 1GMk18TTiy4MExAUTz2/XMKHZwldK20TYLXJpZQ5+9QDFCvsLkwnmGP8xSB5dMb8zlq4 fYmmFN/AEHuSvMcA0GBrKcJ5JSUipO+syoxv43jN4xTq/g/t5pwVJF5WUHfHVXDWIU/a 0apA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=LSUWbb5Ol3C8o+hbXSXWojl/noXHHaVZOSltifqM0WI=; b=djkevotfQn63nmBeErrwbaRAQh183u9mD062+Oo/Dcpx2KnAJEfJe/zv2EFBf95mmO 24/ukXuz7ztnpd8AZhhMRe94uMbOAI+KxhWk+CYi+2ZximQZSWh48jB+VCUZYJNPPiri 8xle7Vdb/ooFJe/e0OAAkm4oz9whFnvpMKcVooxDTuRSXsmwnjA6xAk1DcxoX8Ee5YhG w2o5WACEnPmE29LMnKLwVdhFHE8S1+8SChPZLlSyI8Aqjy1bEt4PBZKxaNPAcnpVZD/J o5EnJyNLOcIDnXqC1Zp4SGO51f+yLQ3ZuZ65OqELSPtl1yHYckO7Mf5u7tfcVoLLyvP5 UOVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnac+RIBx4AUpaqgzk9/utbiOCeAADw8sRPGWYIFSvv/7XDbaFRPrjmJoKSAPZhXMNOHEgg
X-Received: by 10.152.87.98 with SMTP id w2mr36011375laz.27.1413914270259; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.203.193 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfm_B5KfD5SBPzsH4YYuzD2OXdu47TtatPVmd6ihrMCh1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfmH8rRyEDbJjQ=kzMv0nGC=S9gNsE7roE=kqJyVcfgy8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHekuQCLeCYzsnm8AuTUgiVppQHUqR7MKdQ9Q=eFFAy0w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm_B5KfD5SBPzsH4YYuzD2OXdu47TtatPVmd6ihrMCh1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:57:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUF-AXcDuQmYhH91vbgPAxLkYkB==GY9opoRk7zrEP8A7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c34bced2842a0505f29196"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/H_RmxZTEgVGbWU2VAZ_kxeAoohU
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SDP and ssrc-group,
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:57:57 -0000

I'm not sure where it's specified, but here's where it's implemented:

https://code.google.com/p/webrtc/source/browse/trunk/talk/media/webrtc/webrtcvideoengine.cc#4108

It only supports 2 SSRCs for a FID group.  It would ignore any more than
that.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> How is that? Where is that specified? What about if I include 3 ssrc
> values in the ssrc-group? What is each one for?
> On 21 Oct 2014 19:31, "Peter Thatcher" <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>
>> 345259865 is "real"
>> 2693756249 is rtx
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> May I know which SSRC (345259865 or 2693756249) will be used for the
>>> real media stream (plus RED and FEC) and which SSRC will be used for
>>> RTX?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>> m=video 62164 RTP/SAVPF 100 116 117 96
>>> a=mid:video
>>> a=rtpmap:100 VP8/90000
>>> a=rtpmap:116 red/90000
>>> a=rtpmap:117 ulpfec/90000
>>> a=rtpmap:96 rtx/90000
>>> a=fmtp:96 apt=100
>>> a=ssrc-group:FID 345259865 2693756249
>>> a=ssrc:345259865 cname:erS7E/KHLYKTejNs
>>> a=ssrc:345259865 msid:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
>>> c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
>>> a=ssrc:345259865 mslabel:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
>>> a=ssrc:345259865 label:c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
>>> a=ssrc:2693756249 cname:erS7E/KHLYKTejNs
>>> a=ssrc:2693756249 msid:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
>>> c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
>>> a=ssrc:2693756249 mslabel:DWpWct9bWKzTMNYZn5bKVgwZ8Mfy2EtfqBY5
>>> a=ssrc:2693756249 label:c0134f05-e7c2-4afd-a979-4e224de5eb91
>>> -------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RFC 5576 does not clarify it at all:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5576#section-4.2
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> 4.2.  The "ssrc-group" Media Attribute
>>>
>>>    a=ssrc-group:<semantics> <ssrc-id> ...
>>>
>>>    [..]
>>>
>>>    The <semantics> parameter is taken from the specification of the
>>>    "group" attribute [RFC3388].  The initial semantic values defined for
>>>    the "ssrc-group" attribute are FID (Flow Identification) [RFC3388]
>>>    and FEC (Forward Error Correction) [RFC4756].  In each case, the
>>>    relationship among the grouped sources is the same as the
>>>    relationship among corresponding sources in media streams grouped
>>>    using the SDP "group" attribute.
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The referenced RFC 3388 neither clarifies it:
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> 7.4 FID Semantics
>>>
>>>    Several "m" lines grouped together using FID semantics form a media
>>>    flow.  A media agent handling a media flow that comprises several "m"
>>>    lines MUST send a copy of the media to every "m" line part of the
>>>    flow as long as the codecs and the direction attribute present in a
>>>    particular "m" line allow it.
>>>
>>>    It is assumed that the application uses only one codec at a time to
>>>    encode the media produced.  This codec MAY change dynamically during
>>>    the session, but at any particular moment only one codec is in use.
>>>
>>>    The application encodes the media using the current codec and checks
>>>    one by one all the "m" lines that are part of the flow.  If a
>>>    particular "m" line contains the codec being used and the direction
>>>    attribute is "sendonly" or "sendrecv", a copy of the encoded media is
>>>    sent to the address/port specified in that particular media stream.
>>>    If either the "m" line does not contain the codec being used or the
>>>    direction attribute is neither "sendonly" nor "sendrecv", nothing is
>>>    sent over this media stream.
>>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, how is the usage of ssrc-group? Where is it really defined?
>>>
>>> Can I put more than 2 ssrc together in the same ssrc-group line?
>>>
>>> How should the receiver interpret it?
>>>
>>> Does a ssrc-group always mean RTX usage? Where is that specified in
>>> the above SDP?
>>>
>>> Does not the above SDP look a complete mixture of hacks and workarounds?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>> <ibc@aliax.net>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>
>>
>>