Re: [rtcweb] When are ICE candidates added to the SDP

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 05 June 2014 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC8E1A016C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3QgAL3oiKmc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f42.google.com (mail-qg0-f42.google.com [209.85.192.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D591A0167 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id q107so1589713qgd.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 06:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6ASvZLTH9LzJgSTqDIJnKBKzNqWwiuA2BbiWyxv2poA=; b=aFgopdxKnm0N2BzR/FxFb0HYxgdHAkP3DDA9nXRq5uwgK73FINiV+LGXrOxOItSHy6 jgzEYen8X8odAxKpODcHVbynMhC8FID2rjiRGPIAwTVi70IvS97PXLBGjYTlTbDzsUBR l/sMBhZ3r+BF3RDJGK+mSC+R6xQpjHBhf3aAQNdaCZkGwh1gkUTeApntmPDImhklx6Pp A39i+5CSGcVOkeFQQJQC15AKjuntd5KfphigRPIzRjIkMllk7NrikAHQWjNAS6qM9MbV UciBG7Dmoxyp0spCTRvkWkLMO5ITTAcDvqJSeiqPIlVXwQACMubmeZA/uonf/IIi2W6n FqSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn6r+fPvmQAgb4dy2AXh8mxbju5S3N0ogUc3HkNfSwFYsIBaaM9ARfN/kYhVzhx+aP7WIUT
X-Received: by 10.140.109.201 with SMTP id l67mr79573902qgf.72.1401976137694; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 06:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.203.165 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnajw3xXaXd=ETHB-6JNzJahv1qpkokrvHjg+wz7fT0Ag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNUTf42tS9FrjS9Q6Zk8LBkhpKOR1z2v8MHoeNEUf93Mw@mail.gmail.com> <804DCB7A-9D65-4438-82C7-1A553905984B@iii.ca> <CABcZeBN9o8ngf6P4TQWhGXseJ5bysFgdCGbBtAeXrCx1Sn1zcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2KijjfV3VKDGT4yj4FmwQZmrcfFEmTXMHJb2oPS5jiqQ@mail.gmail.com> <5379E879.6080903@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfnajw3xXaXd=ETHB-6JNzJahv1qpkokrvHjg+wz7fT0Ag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:48:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfmfV7qb3+bHGW5r9dbJ1Ay2j1kKYEha1+u1z2Buun5L-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Fitq9qK8QlpM7dkzQJ5x2Ewv84g
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] When are ICE candidates added to the SDP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:49:05 -0000

2014-06-05 15:18 GMT+02:00 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>:
> 2014-05-19 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>:
>> The onicecandidate(NULL) always seemed inelegant to me; it wasn't supplying
>> a candidate, it was indicating something else.
>>
>> I'd be happy with replacing it with an iceGatheringState change callback (if
>> we can ensure that this will do the Right Thing in all cases...)
>
> +1

And the opposite is a bug in the spec because if the iceGatheringState
does not fire when indeed the "ICE gathering" status has changed to
"ended", what is it supposed to do?


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>