Re: [rtcweb] Reminder: Working group last call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch

Hi Colin,

Thanks for reviewing the document.  As you note, there are open
issues; 5.1, for example, has this:

"This is a  deliberate implementation complexity versus security tradeoff.
 [[ OPEN ISSUE::  Should we be more aggressive about this?]]"

As far as I am aware,though, the document in each case includes a
proposal for the Open Issue,
and it is that which would be in a WG document post last-call.  But if
folks looked at the document
and answered the "open issues" within, that would certainly be very
welcome input.

Were there any Open Issues or other points you wanted to comment on directly?

Ted

but there

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> This draft has a number of places where open issues are noted (e.g., in Sections 5.1 and 5.5, but there are many others). It seems premature to issue a working group last call until those are resolved.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> On 25 Feb 2013, at 23:27, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> This is a reminder that there is an ongoing last call for
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-06.  Please send comments, including
>> those of the "reviewed and no issues" ilk, by March 9th, 2012.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Ted Hardie
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This begins a working group last call for
>>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch.  Please send comments to the list by
>>> March 9, 2013.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Ted, Cullen, Magnus
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
>
>
>