Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0262C127843 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtApyGXJochv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30D412704A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p68so92983173qke.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aJR5GpTBZeGodFm+QOEZfsTc/MnK5MKbwxQF0p91Wi8=; b=W5uVEKaOKXiBWEmvsH9hM9Dg7gvFaoGOAf45TgVPP8+O4B91zegy2GUwgIFSVkMP7P JTh4H2fBuH9yzXTmcupT9qcTrMYfGkpVl4a0Fu18jBtD35K+YtwqworPk9zvUmngO4qm Kowd7ghYsK7jq/zCMeqLArGUTF4eGK9UwvAEP2VHcg1pkdj3SS2Q29X+SWwDOKIkw/kh wah9bqzAXaqy3J4co3LpWrGK55ObsTUQ7sE7AMvP1JzHjcZWTaYlGuAX64NUm6RtIuZy SuB8isCuAeNQB70yn4u9BHlutIesMMlu+ruRXHm1xQdgkTta0SeuF3l1uztU6dD4pFaZ hh0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aJR5GpTBZeGodFm+QOEZfsTc/MnK5MKbwxQF0p91Wi8=; b=KsteQkI9tSLgoyPyzt0JZCWNGhoBX+urGPC41ZalOYCemcXkLfsKPQwgk2ypxqey4r smwEydyOCuPsUQBvQ3gOZ3iQSXgZLOlGJY3SmxqBp+EgmZukxWK9VxJ1L7Sdcs5x1hLP 4xGaiNA9mXiTg0MXawwh1Np+XAhUWNd9b4YDr48LjfKhqKg1IZS7FL6jdO82GgJxMlx6 7n3sUTfKsmYmqxiiwt/YNYJBqaYJDo55j1jJTJWtpAWKTRxHzgCKAACdvVrmJh2QYMgz JW0NNWqgxqUvbGmJ7zsgSjzDc+9xJvXMxx5fUqfqbkupnYv8Fo0T+aPZZJBGky80npDz 8JBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2olk4msYDBas2LXAAp21lTuAIrNJqtpTOg3hdPsJ5ZTODIj2n0AaRg4EKMERDRXKNtLCf8DtOpSjDtIw==
X-Received: by 10.55.204.157 with SMTP id n29mr43084396qkl.73.1491842311044; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.52.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com>
References: <149179817951.3103.12674759956021329524@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMRcRGRrRg3j1g-WPGr5ZBJvDA6LD94dwf++vK563euUp49Yfg@mail.gmail.com> <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTPGEob_biZ3X80UtH948EYn7P3c6ZTsxrF1rYC9H_AdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146d05202c749054cd29bbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/LCtz3IoLww00INIgbJuKVK97auo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:38:34 -0000

Hi Jonathan

   You are right on the article part and happy to change it. I like  “Annotated
Example SDP for WebRTC." or " “Annotated Example SDP for RtcWeb"  or
replace WebRTC/RtcWeb with JSEP ..

Let's finalize one and I can make the updates

Cheers
Suhas

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> wrote:

> Not to start a bikeshed, but the title “SDP for the WebRTC” isn’t very
> good.
>
> First of all, “WebRTC” doesn’t usually take an article.
>
> Secondly, the title doesn’t make clear that this contains annotated
> examples.
>
> I’d suggest something like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC.” (or perhaps
> "for JSEP”).
>
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
>   I submitted version-05 that includes:
>      - IPv6 examples
>      - fix idnits errors
>
> look forward for your feedback
>
>
> cheers
> Suhas
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:22 PM
> Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers
> of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : SDP for the WebRTC
>         Authors         : Suhas Nandakumar
>                           Cullen Jennings
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
>         Pages           : 107
>         Date            : 2017-04-09
>
> Abstract:
>    The Real-Time Communications in WEB-browsers (Rtcweb) working group
>    is charged to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich
>    communication using audio, video and data between two peers' web
>    browsers.  With in the Rtcweb framework, Session Description protocol
>    (SDP) is used for negotiating session capabilities between the peers.
>    Such a negotiation happens based on the SDP Offer/Answer exchange
>    mechanism.
>
>    This document provides an informational reference in describing the
>    role of SDP and the Offer/Answer exchange mechanism for the most
>    common Rtcweb use-cases.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>