Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0262C127843 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtApyGXJochv for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30D412704A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p68so92983173qke.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aJR5GpTBZeGodFm+QOEZfsTc/MnK5MKbwxQF0p91Wi8=; b=W5uVEKaOKXiBWEmvsH9hM9Dg7gvFaoGOAf45TgVPP8+O4B91zegy2GUwgIFSVkMP7P JTh4H2fBuH9yzXTmcupT9qcTrMYfGkpVl4a0Fu18jBtD35K+YtwqworPk9zvUmngO4qm Kowd7ghYsK7jq/zCMeqLArGUTF4eGK9UwvAEP2VHcg1pkdj3SS2Q29X+SWwDOKIkw/kh wah9bqzAXaqy3J4co3LpWrGK55ObsTUQ7sE7AMvP1JzHjcZWTaYlGuAX64NUm6RtIuZy SuB8isCuAeNQB70yn4u9BHlutIesMMlu+ruRXHm1xQdgkTta0SeuF3l1uztU6dD4pFaZ hh0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aJR5GpTBZeGodFm+QOEZfsTc/MnK5MKbwxQF0p91Wi8=; b=KsteQkI9tSLgoyPyzt0JZCWNGhoBX+urGPC41ZalOYCemcXkLfsKPQwgk2ypxqey4r smwEydyOCuPsUQBvQ3gOZ3iQSXgZLOlGJY3SmxqBp+EgmZukxWK9VxJ1L7Sdcs5x1hLP 4xGaiNA9mXiTg0MXawwh1Np+XAhUWNd9b4YDr48LjfKhqKg1IZS7FL6jdO82GgJxMlx6 7n3sUTfKsmYmqxiiwt/YNYJBqaYJDo55j1jJTJWtpAWKTRxHzgCKAACdvVrmJh2QYMgz JW0NNWqgxqUvbGmJ7zsgSjzDc+9xJvXMxx5fUqfqbkupnYv8Fo0T+aPZZJBGky80npDz 8JBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2olk4msYDBas2LXAAp21lTuAIrNJqtpTOg3hdPsJ5ZTODIj2n0AaRg4EKMERDRXKNtLCf8DtOpSjDtIw==
X-Received: by 10.55.204.157 with SMTP id n29mr43084396qkl.73.1491842311044; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.52.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com>
References: <149179817951.3103.12674759956021329524@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMRcRGRrRg3j1g-WPGr5ZBJvDA6LD94dwf++vK563euUp49Yfg@mail.gmail.com> <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:38:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTPGEob_biZ3X80UtH948EYn7P3c6ZTsxrF1rYC9H_AdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146d05202c749054cd29bbd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/LCtz3IoLww00INIgbJuKVK97auo>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:38:34 -0000
Hi Jonathan You are right on the article part and happy to change it. I like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC." or " “Annotated Example SDP for RtcWeb" or replace WebRTC/RtcWeb with JSEP .. Let's finalize one and I can make the updates Cheers Suhas On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> wrote: > Not to start a bikeshed, but the title “SDP for the WebRTC” isn’t very > good. > > First of all, “WebRTC” doesn’t usually take an article. > > Secondly, the title doesn’t make clear that this contains annotated > examples. > > I’d suggest something like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC.” (or perhaps > "for JSEP”). > > On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello All > > I submitted version-05 that includes: > - IPv6 examples > - fix idnits errors > > look forward for your feedback > > > cheers > Suhas > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:22 PM > Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers > of the IETF. > > Title : SDP for the WebRTC > Authors : Suhas Nandakumar > Cullen Jennings > Filename : draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt > Pages : 107 > Date : 2017-04-09 > > Abstract: > The Real-Time Communications in WEB-browsers (Rtcweb) working group > is charged to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich > communication using audio, video and data between two peers' web > browsers. With in the Rtcweb framework, Session Description protocol > (SDP) is used for negotiating session capabilities between the peers. > Such a negotiation happens based on the SDP Offer/Answer exchange > mechanism. > > This document provides an informational reference in describing the > role of SDP and the Offer/Answer exchange mechanism for the most > common Rtcweb use-cases. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > > >
- [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-0… Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-s… Suhas Nandakumar