Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14F3129A92 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o0kFdpraAf35 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A23A129A9C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f133so101620985qke.2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ruc9zSoHHi/DUfl8Fz8YBWXxWi1sfiKDDztEfE71jnc=; b=eH3Kt/xW+PV7q4U8ZCbXAN64An8+PG8EZXBuzI/HT61l9Sl6pyXaYIwozcNn8zOR5Q nAJ99y3PoNZbvSizWHUZ1q9v8gK4l41B6P0IcXXddugmISmnukORmQX19JwBApfW/gra cU1g9To7aAybj/ln2LVHWQR+JXiVqPnysGSFvUDGEWgLG4mnGsbwwSP0KbFEFeTZvY/b V5Olr/uflAzD3BxVp9p0CFthC3cNAmbayp5yqq1EnWJMY+phqUa5EI8hzzjk50v4YP/h P2bvfnhNniNWhfxwrgItu3N+bzNCwhPBb7GL0cN0wJir+O0AIox2lVYB9LnfdICK12XX 5GOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ruc9zSoHHi/DUfl8Fz8YBWXxWi1sfiKDDztEfE71jnc=; b=ttr6eZP8o72GKUCEuH02AfPAqJlXsruhWe5EN6SJ/+H5KZTCpctot/zC4eph+t8UPM FgVlADkaCE8i/bHNRYddUuUa/6wSrX3p2l5RjHl6Ildf1OW6BBF54MCW82kwArIs8iA1 2BN7XSNrUR0SzieK6xWEJF+RYBwlFC4zcaZVL35ko/UTFrc2b08riC+rvi8XDGIN/XFG heEHNz2AYd06UypR0qAJTC1g00maNgk6Vi7+aeG2c2T2wOOtq750DDRAgvLGA4Chhhis cGYXVcbW+2CilZ5K1I0dQSMFCOZiVg1vauGyF3qTfxa9mviFX5j8LZoskd7O3m0VXcu9 0khw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1b09507hEOjHKvQQ+d8v4nTcEgH1zP38JZPIilVdCPn9hhc8UOok0X+CWPGvPBikMiuNE/6jfPYr5HFA==
X-Received: by 10.55.33.166 with SMTP id f38mr49002121qki.5.1491843628380; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.52.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <98A1C2D6-34FE-405E-8405-83F654B43188@vidyo.com>
References: <149179817951.3103.12674759956021329524@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMRcRGRrRg3j1g-WPGr5ZBJvDA6LD94dwf++vK563euUp49Yfg@mail.gmail.com> <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com> <CAMRcRGTPGEob_biZ3X80UtH948EYn7P3c6ZTsxrF1rYC9H_AdQ@mail.gmail.com> <98A1C2D6-34FE-405E-8405-83F654B43188@vidyo.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:00:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGQt5NSALHu_6Av=yhVonbvH-Wez=9Z5QGCz+ecAMXv2bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144dbea87bd01054cd2e931"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/S_JRPhIEiCih9Ppy6MFlPFFxWn0>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:00:38 -0000

Thanks Jonathan .. Just submitted version -06 with the title change

./Suhas

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> wrote:

> I like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC”, since I think that’ll be the
> clearest for the intended audience, but since you're document editor I
> think this is ultimately your decision.
>
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan
>
>    You are right on the article part and happy to change it. I like  “Annotated
> Example SDP for WebRTC." or " “Annotated Example SDP for RtcWeb"  or
> replace WebRTC/RtcWeb with JSEP ..
>
> Let's finalize one and I can make the updates
>
> Cheers
> Suhas
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not to start a bikeshed, but the title “SDP for the WebRTC” isn’t very
>> good.
>>
>> First of all, “WebRTC” doesn’t usually take an article.
>>
>> Secondly, the title doesn’t make clear that this contains annotated
>> examples.
>>
>> I’d suggest something like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC.” (or
>> perhaps "for JSEP”).
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All
>>
>>   I submitted version-05 that includes:
>>      - IPv6 examples
>>      - fix idnits errors
>>
>> look forward for your feedback
>>
>>
>> cheers
>> Suhas
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Date: Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:22 PM
>> Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers
>> of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : SDP for the WebRTC
>>         Authors         : Suhas Nandakumar
>>                           Cullen Jennings
>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
>>         Pages           : 107
>>         Date            : 2017-04-09
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    The Real-Time Communications in WEB-browsers (Rtcweb) working group
>>    is charged to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich
>>    communication using audio, video and data between two peers' web
>>    browsers.  With in the Rtcweb framework, Session Description protocol
>>    (SDP) is used for negotiating session capabilities between the peers.
>>    Such a negotiation happens based on the SDP Offer/Answer exchange
>>    mechanism.
>>
>>    This document provides an informational reference in describing the
>>    role of SDP and the Offer/Answer exchange mechanism for the most
>>    common Rtcweb use-cases.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>>
>
>