Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D9F127BA3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_Qto6YxmfHA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD4F126E01 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g60so605361qtd.3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b7KSaWNoEJcFr751DjXHDP+Kk9Hj/gC2XWFn9qr+Vi8=; b=ItNymc0ulTDvZ3jbtg268jLcAu22+3uYek+CXkNQjwPcVEEk5b8XsWJbZzjeSJ1ict b5d6S8oQ6OTXzNZ1RBfvF8Ptkexqpj5LjrB5ESmd0xH2fybSLekKbzzTQlnMW51UuisN OtIVxRuHCdTcTlptrfHtFzv6qwcSLh5dWe2K4CfPd4ETrf2sqz6tBmoP4HaF2Vsxg2Eg YnL+PHhvKNq/w4UOBkJqv9idHR3auhahEt2tX7zxaSZ/YSXGNYkRaidH6E4bPUBIkViA sPimmGBn7LBMLITUigQv2mhWVnQ5B49Q1STTj6w+F71sXNmCiCcKXXTvalbGfheumbHT hqjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b7KSaWNoEJcFr751DjXHDP+Kk9Hj/gC2XWFn9qr+Vi8=; b=ecJmmNjmLla2PK7LEldziyKbhJyBj9m5/mXsZH6cOAP1OtbCVAOdamDWAuqVAFuKpp jyg4T2TThx9iJWTm8LinqlfdMsgdou5/Hwjgxkpl5ELJ7TrIAxLVHui/ZNtoaNgcqBUI g7oU6q0C4MoyTmcR+aUY7lFyZ9qukySL0s8ui8Fj1oi3XYWxeL22a7imcZLIsCoS+fnX FIVLCamMS3uuVCJOFlqJLMNHd/K8fXGwfDrrMRdB8Fsf0JizO29ukDsWUzHuOsIp3oiW G9GqQofDGs8rPGKHqpN6ebb7ggAnsuCvbRLtxIz+/5sYOa5UFN+UCyhvXuylHDJS6TYl mgbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Qauzam+G0GnIn0CF5yg9kMea+VcnN5MLMuLqlIJozyvRVrTkn mqcuLOUTWGzAqsoir9CXrj/D22BtYw==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.156 with SMTP id k28mr15308573qtb.202.1492538891912; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.51.162 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0XEYTuD1cNA5J0Gc-nbRX+irkvmWNucV8Op4a99aDFWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149179817951.3103.12674759956021329524@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMRcRGRrRg3j1g-WPGr5ZBJvDA6LD94dwf++vK563euUp49Yfg@mail.gmail.com> <8D61576D-716E-4CF5-B330-EB4A9A9D6B6D@vidyo.com> <CAMRcRGTPGEob_biZ3X80UtH948EYn7P3c6ZTsxrF1rYC9H_AdQ@mail.gmail.com> <98A1C2D6-34FE-405E-8405-83F654B43188@vidyo.com> <CAMRcRGQt5NSALHu_6Av=yhVonbvH-Wez=9Z5QGCz+ecAMXv2bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0XEYTuD1cNA5J0Gc-nbRX+irkvmWNucV8Op4a99aDFWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:08:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGR-sUC9DJgCP_d2c267uQCbz2sUh2yzMobikYv7YyhueA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1139f328774a78054d74ca19"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/MWH0s0n-fWAJpvWGVOSmQ_BOHU4>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:16:09 -0000

Hello Justin

 Sorry for the delayed response. The attributes in the examples do match
JSEP (other than few human errors) but the order might not exactly match.

I am happy to rework to match the order of the attributes, if needed.
Please let me know

Cheers
Suhas

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote:

> Suhas, have you verified that these examples are aligned with those in
> JSEP (i.e. include the same attribs in the same order?)
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jonathan .. Just submitted version -06 with the title change
>>
>> ./Suhas
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC”, since I think that’ll be the
>>> clearest for the intended audience, but since you're document editor I
>>> think this is ultimately your decision.
>>>
>>> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jonathan
>>>
>>>    You are right on the article part and happy to change it. I like  “Annotated
>>> Example SDP for WebRTC." or " “Annotated Example SDP for RtcWeb"  or
>>> replace WebRTC/RtcWeb with JSEP ..
>>>
>>> Let's finalize one and I can make the updates
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Suhas
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not to start a bikeshed, but the title “SDP for the WebRTC” isn’t very
>>>> good.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, “WebRTC” doesn’t usually take an article.
>>>>
>>>> Secondly, the title doesn’t make clear that this contains annotated
>>>> examples.
>>>>
>>>> I’d suggest something like “Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC.” (or
>>>> perhaps "for JSEP”).
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 10, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello All
>>>>
>>>>   I submitted version-05 that includes:
>>>>      - IPv6 examples
>>>>      - fix idnits errors
>>>>
>>>> look forward for your feedback
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> Suhas
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>>>> Date: Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:22 PM
>>>> Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
>>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>>>> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>> directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in
>>>> WEB-browsers of the IETF.
>>>>
>>>>         Title           : SDP for the WebRTC
>>>>         Authors         : Suhas Nandakumar
>>>>                           Cullen Jennings
>>>>         Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05.txt
>>>>         Pages           : 107
>>>>         Date            : 2017-04-09
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>    The Real-Time Communications in WEB-browsers (Rtcweb) working group
>>>>    is charged to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich
>>>>    communication using audio, video and data between two peers' web
>>>>    browsers.  With in the Rtcweb framework, Session Description protocol
>>>>    (SDP) is used for negotiating session capabilities between the peers.
>>>>    Such a negotiation happens based on the SDP Offer/Answer exchange
>>>>    mechanism.
>>>>
>>>>    This document provides an informational reference in describing the
>>>>    role of SDP and the Offer/Answer exchange mechanism for the most
>>>>    common Rtcweb use-cases.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/
>>>>
>>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>>>>
>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-05
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>> submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>