IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 13 November 2011 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFA621F8B43 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlwPBpIMiGiR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366421F8B3F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywt34 with SMTP id 34so3754268ywt.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vzMzs68XgESX8yJQkvXBlqm+GMxa8kZpufy2/VR/N1s=; b=JEGW0251mdGlskIUQtcejw0MfGUHTd9Vlcr6QhZtCE1YcVn0Esfptg9WDWwvansgPd 6GwWSHojWvH7V0m5Ou3vkyvH7AUwD+PtM0D1fwnphr1avYj/Ad5z5EpamabX7987otHZ vgAYnHOWIgozVqCGYSdNdW8udT+toTa0ixl74=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.197.72 with SMTP id s48mr7235955yhn.81.1321175089360; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.110.33 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.110.33 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=Gw2p3Yo702c7Jwu+jprbBkXF7Qsux+78Rg29=DMLiHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4EB26D22.5090000@ericsson.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6CD2FA@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegf=kiqHpV_cLk7vGbo=F28mRVbDLfMi_7Uo0+cXwALM7AA@mail.gmail.com> <387F9047F55E8C42850AD6B3A7A03C6C01CE7059@inba-mail01.sonusnet.com> <CALiegf=Gw2p3Yo702c7Jwu+jprbBkXF7Qsux+78Rg29=DMLiHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:04:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAfgmufypRydaGeOLFZ42mfmvS_88M5JckeaVz6EA-nCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303f6c80e3305704b19a0b82"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Regarding Federation Arguments
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:04:51 -0000

On Nov 11, 2011 8:41 AM, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
>
> El 11/11/2011 06:23, "Ravindran, Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
escribió:
>
>
>
> This is the very same argument again. IMHO it is time for you to assume
that this WG has decided by consensus that there will be no standard
in-the-wire protocol in WebRTC, nor a suggested proposal by this WG.


I must ask you not to call consensus for this working group. If you feel
strongly that a matter has reached consensus, contact the chairs and
discuss with us the timing.

Ted Hardie

>
> IMHO the only reason for having a "standard" WebrTC signaling protocol is
to make a business for gateway vendors building "standard WebRTC-to-SIP
gateways". I cannot imagine other reasons. That is not a legitime argument
in a IETF specification.
>
> Anyhow I will not discuss again about this subject. There is consensus.
Time to move on. Please spend your time in helping with open subjects
rather than trying to reopen the discussion about the standard protocol.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email