IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Mon, 15 May 2017 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC7512946D; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id obETfNPrmqu0; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp105.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp105.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34ACC12EA8C; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 54A595431; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp6.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id F1AFF54DE; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:48:42 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [192.168.200.189] (mystydragon.com [72.253.150.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Mon, 15 May 2017 12:48:44 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6B1D4260-62AF-4B42-9143-3BA8C72DB2AC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CBA0BF0@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 06:48:40 -1000
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D578E2C6-B692-41F2-84D2-A2A268C8F98A@iii.ca>
References: <149285978295.25905.7347383325486705546.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB805F3@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <15D737F9-2F65-45C5-AA26-946910B4030F@sn3rd.com> <D539F225.1C532%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBP2f0BRob205nfoeLWn+1KKe6-mw1GRqFbyfwa9Y7B9mg@mail.gmail.com> <D1C03CFA-0F3E-4250-B053-F8F0B4B28ACC@iii.ca> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CBA05BC@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <A67D1A42-CDBE-4A4B-95DC-CB94A351A016@iii.ca> <225E4246-AB30-4877-9DCF-D5D2A8ABDF18@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBP_oZt6YgXrSNqd6vupWG2Uhzm9Y524J1aaWUq4aXA0sw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CBA0B12@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <CABcZeBNMqmjADXTJZwKNzbtav0rs1P1kbUc26cVhzeUy531S7g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CBA0BF0@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Qjsl8OHg9iHK9Q5TT7AytvRHFmQ>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:52:09 -0000

> On May 13, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I am, however, aware that a number of dependencies do refer 5245bis. Maybe they don't need to, but my point is that I think all dependencies should reference the same ICE spec - RFC 5245 *OR* 5245bis. And I think RTCWEB, MMUSIC and ICE should agree on which spec. Since more or less the same people participate in all those groups, I don't think it should be a difficult thing to achieve. 

I feel very strongly that unless one can show there is technical part of draft X you need to read to implement draft Y, then Y should not normatively reference X. 

Perhaps there is something in ICEbis that is needed by one of the RTCweb specs and if so, we should discuss this but so far I'm not aware of any.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email