IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Wed, 26 April 2017 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3D613180C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W70LX9xUaL5M for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4E612426E for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x188so88128975itb.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mlrvkP1f5l0GgftanXglibgw+K3RmbIKFJQUHgyXGJM=; b=FZfpQlt8/p4lm7YC76+vIjRTlXxs/kFSdpJMehnnvvAuxneReoGydC9zcpu9KMc010 OO6s9uvWUubkCLC5xPYM7vqHo+04777+VmIXcVvJGL7iKzbJiGB6xS+tRvnBz+QRxgM4 EyXxgC6xGizRUfoK5CQhz8ESY9QpKLZ2DlA5c=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mlrvkP1f5l0GgftanXglibgw+K3RmbIKFJQUHgyXGJM=; b=MsVZQNDXK7Myq/vMRRGgf9HVlMSwFUevFCmyqaA3PD9RPY2uwbvNxVunrlS3vo4+/c DpICAZ1n4MLP8W8CjWSAPBEhPQ8AanDRti3n8G3G+wLlEn8YCUb4dVFI0hbDtcyJ8j8l ZqhD9ZAdtg81xHrteywHkQOSXvZcXMQRLKAK2DDMUFR9FbPbSanmMEfPXyYm5ncYkxwR Y5zzkbDxrC4toqKYrYJabXTlnE4+lC+EGL3Gqc2UMIsNJcLWCdIyBIgl1I/NHgz8n9ZI URVzbFwpGeI7TRYZPoj1YTmwdyzkZyXIdXQ05NhwdnPwKU7In1h90dfwEUUzY7G+LxZd H1+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4wccwMq7UjHdRPh7Z5j42rLUL1/TZzwzA4Kk2i5W1uMri6+nmx g3w9kmri0UY1bQ==
X-Received: by 10.36.110.87 with SMTP id w84mr4781093itc.47.1493175769147; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.187] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w134sm1073112iod.14.2017.04.25.20.02.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB805F3@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:02:41 -0500
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org" <rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <15D737F9-2F65-45C5-AA26-946910B4030F@sn3rd.com>
References: <149285978295.25905.7347383325486705546.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB805F3@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/c7DIKMXHDniL6tM_wJR7rRpd1ww>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:02:51 -0000

> On Apr 23, 2017, at 14:44, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Your citation to ICE is to 5245-bis, but at least the JSEP editor consensus was that WebRTC depended on 5245, so this needs to be resolved one way or the other.
> 
> Keep in mind that, no matter what draft-rtcweb-overview and draft-rtcweb-jsep explicitly say, both specs reference 5245bis *IMPLICITLY*, e.g., via draft-mmusic-bundle, draft-ice-trickle etc... As I have indicated in the past, it would cause confusion to reference both.
> 
> So, I think we shall reference 5245-bis everywhere (I also thought we already decided no that in the past)-
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer

/* bike shed alert: 
/* 
/* Assuming you’re of the mind that a bis/updates draft is
/* signaling to all implementors of the original RFC that the
/* intention is that all implementations be updated then it’s
/* a bit more than implicit.

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email